THE INJURED WAS OPERATING A CHAINSAW CLEARING A DOWNED TREE THAT WAS LAYING AGAINST A SLOPE. WHEN THE EMPLOYEE CUT THE TREE AT ITS BASE, THE TOP OF THE TREE EXTENDING BEYOND THE CREST OF SLOPE FELL TO THE GROUND ALLOWING THE BASE OF THE TREE TO SWING UPWARD, STRIKING THE EMPLOYEE IN THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE FACE. THERE WERE NO IMMEDIATE WITNESSES. CAUSE OF ACCIDENT IS SPECULATIVE.
Chesterville Sand & Gravel Plant: 1 recorded fatality Metal/Non-Metal
Chesterville Sand & Gravel Plant has $6K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 0 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Chesterville Sand & Gravel Plant.
- Fatalities
- 1
- Total incidents
- 11
- Years on record
- 1988–2016
- Latest incident
- Jul 2016
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Chesterville Sand & Gravel Plant has $6K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 0 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2025-10-10
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz13
- Respirable dust, <.1mg9
Show the individual readings (22)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | 0.48 | 0.27 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2025-10-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.22 | 0.6 | 0.37 | Utility Man |
| 2025-10-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.56 | Truck Driver |
| 2023-09-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.26 | 0.4 | 0.65 | Truck Driver |
| 2023-09-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | Dragline Operator | ||
| 2023-09-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2023-09-19 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.21 | 0.59 | 0.36 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2018-10-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.73 | Utility Man |
| 2018-10-23 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2018-10-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.74 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2018-10-23 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.26 | 0.46 | 0.57 | Utility Man |
| 2018-10-23 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2015-06-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2015-06-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2015-06-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2015-06-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2015-01-22 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2015-01-22 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Supervisor, Co. Official | ||
| 2010-10-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.31 | 1.33 | 0.23 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2010-10-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.16 | 0.93 | 0.17 | Utility Man |
| 2010-10-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.49 | 2.12 | 0.23 | Utility Man |
| 2010-10-29 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.82 | Utility Man |
Chesterville Sand & Gravel Plant recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2024.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 19.01 | 19.01 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2003 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2002 * | 9.68 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Chesterville Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. 1950 to 2012
- The National Lime & Stone Company 2012 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 8 |
| 2025 | 8 |
| 2024 | 9 |
| 2023 | 6 |
| 2022 | 7 |
| 2021 | 7 |
| 2020 | 7 |
| 2019 | 8 |
| 2018 | 8 |
| 2017 | 8 |
| 2016 | 8 |
| 2015 | 8 |
| 2014 | 10 |
| 2013 | 10 |
| 2012 | 8 |
| 2011 | 9 |
| 2010 | 9 |
| 2009 | 8 |
| 2008 | 9 |
| 2007 | 12 |
| 2006 | 10 |
| 2005 | 12 |
| 2004 | 12 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2002 | 11 |
| 2001 | 11 |
| 2000 | 9 |
Chesterville Sand & Gravel Plant sits in Morrow County, Ohio, where the Census mining category is 0.5% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 6,174 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4,422 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5,092 | 4 | 1 | 785.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5,807 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5,176 | 2 | 0 | 386.4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3,662 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5,559 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 5,685 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 97 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 5,896 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 3,899 | 2 | 0 | 513.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 4,761 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 4,965 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 5,028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 4,486 | 1 | 0 | 222.9 |
| 2022 Q3 | 5,240 | 2 | 0 | 381.7 |
| 2022 Q2 | 4,895 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 4,900 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 4,888 | 1 | 0 | 204.6 |
| 2021 Q2 | 4,407 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 1,199 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 4,730 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 5,113 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 4,929 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 985 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 5,514 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 6,163 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 6,598 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 5,855 | 2 | 0 | 341.6 |
| 2018 Q3 | 6,662 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 6,364 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 6,076 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 6,746 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 5,986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 2,165 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 5,035 | 1 | 0 | 198.6 |
| 2016 Q3 | 6,606 | 1 | 0 | 151.4 |
| 2016 Q2 | 6,203 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 6,512 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 5,960 | 1 | 0 | 167.8 |
| 2015 Q2 | 5,960 | 5 | 2 | 838.9 |
| 2015 Q1 | 2,606 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 5,995 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 7,632 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 6,686 | 1 | 0 | 149.6 |
| 2014 Q1 | 3,420 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 6,592 | 1 | 0 | 151.7 |
| 2013 Q3 | 7,840 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 6,623 | 2 | 0 | 302.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 3,266 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 3,657 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 4,183 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 4,287 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 3,798 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 3,715 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 5,052 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 5,089 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 2,756 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 3,546 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 4,889 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 5,093 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 3,598 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 4,612 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 4,085 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 1,932 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 3,145 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 5,026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 4,043 | 1 | 0 | 247.3 |
| 2008 Q1 | 2,652 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 3,551 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 5,246 | 1 | 0 | 190.6 |
| 2007 Q2 | 4,780 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 2,919 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 4,678 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 5,014 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 4,719 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 3,136 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 4,807 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 6,458 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 5,368 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 3,226 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 5,258 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 6,259 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 3,744 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 5,347 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 6,196 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 5,723 | 1 | 0 | 174.7 |
| 2003 Q1 | 3,491 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 5,065 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 5,703 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 5,261 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 4,625 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 5,666 | 2 | 0 | 353.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 6,444 | 1 | 0 | 155.2 |
| 2001 Q2 | 4,956 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 3,911 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 5,100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 5,772 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 6,440 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 4,146 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Fatalities at this mine
1 recordedReportable incidents
10 on file (excluding fatalities above)2016 · 2 incidents
Employee pushed a large piece of clay off the conveyor and felt a pain in back.
Employee was tightening a jam nut on the crusher when the wrench slipped causing EE to fall backwards striking back on the steps behind EE.
2015 · 2 incidents
Employee was picking clay chunks off the picker belt when he felt a sharp pain in his back and side.
The injured employee was walking to the plant at the beginning of the shift. A second employee pulled up beside him in his personal vehicle to offer the victim a ride when he ran over his left foot. Injury was a fracture of the left foot.
2007 · 1 incident
A large flat stone became lodged at the transfer point between the scalping screen chute & picker belt. EE attempted to dislodge the rock from the walkway beside picker but was unable to remove it. He moved around to the end of picker belt & used a spud bar to try to remove the rock. He jerked on it. The bar slipped, he lost his balance & fell to the concrete floor below.
2002 · 1 incident
SEVERAL EE WERE CHANGING SCREENS. THEY PLACED A NEW SCREEN ON TOP A HANDRAIL IN ORDER TO PUSH SCREEN OVER THE SIDE. NO ONE WAS OBSERVED IN THE AREA. HOWEVER THE INJURED PARTY CAME DOWN THE STE PS UNDER THE SCREEN & WAS STRUCK ON THE FOOT. PIECES OF BELTING LYING ON THE PLATFORM HAD OBSTRUCTED HIS VIEW OF THE AREA.
1998 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS WORKING ON PICKER CONVEYOR AT GRAVEL PLANT. A ROCK CAME DOWN THE CONVEYOR THAT NEEDED PUSHED OFF. HE TRIED TO PUSH IT OFF BUT COULD NOT MOVE IT AND IT PUSHED HIS RIGHT ARM INTO A STEEL PLATE. X-RAYS OF ARM AND WRIST SHOWED NO ABNORMALITIES.
1996 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS WALKING AROUND TRUCK (WHICH WAS PARKED). HE SLIPPED ON PATCH OF ICE TRIED TO CATCH HIMSELF AND STRAINED MUSCLE IN HIS BACK.
1990 · 1 incident
CHANGING REAR SPRING ON DUMP TRUCK WHEN JACK SLIPPED AND TRUCK FELL CUTTING INDEX FINGER ON LEFT HAND AND BRUISING 2ND AND 3RD FINGERS. EMPLOYEE NOT SURE WHAT CUT HIS FINGER.
1988 · 1 incident
EMPL CLIMBED UP LADDER OF LOADER TO H AND OPERATR GREASE GUN. WHEN HE DESCENDED LADDER STEPPING OFF BOTTOM STEP HIS ANKLE TURNED CAUSING HIM TO FALL. HIS LEFT ANKLE WAS BROKEN.