THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEDGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPO RT THE CAUSE OR NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS.THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMEN
Bullitt Transloader Coal
Bullitt Transloader tiene $4K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $3K pendientes en 0 expedientes impugnados, ademas del muestreo de salud y el registro completo de incidentes.
Seguir esta mina
Avísenme cuando se presente un nuevo incidente de la MSHA en Bullitt Transloader.
- Muertes
- 0
- Incidentes totales
- 69
- Años en registro
- 1983–1995
- Último incidente
- Sep 1995
ⓘ
Esta tasa son las citaciones registradas divididas entre las horas de inspección de la MSHA, por cada 100 horas. Refleja el esfuerzo de inspección, no el tamaño de la mina ni la producción.Bullitt Transloader tiene $4K en multas propuestas de MSHA y $3K pendientes en 0 expedientes impugnados.
ⓘ
Las diferencias entre las multas propuestas y las pagadas reflejan tanto acuerdos y reducciones en conferencia como montos aun adeudados. Pendiente es el saldo que se debe actualmente.El muestreo de MSHA en Bullitt Transloader muestra un polvo respirable de carbon promedio de 0.17 mg/m3 (100% en cumplimiento) en 3 muestras.
ⓘ
Una muestra es una medicion de cumplimiento en un momento dado, no un historial de exposicion individual. Estas cifras describen registros de muestreo de MSHA y no establecen causalidad ni dosis personal.ⓘ
Las cifras de polvo respirable de carbon y silice corresponden a instalaciones de carbon. El cumplimiento del polvo se mide frente a la norma actual de 1.5 mg/m3; se incluyen muestras anteriores a la norma de 2014, por lo que las tasas de cumplimiento son una senal historica aproximada.ⓘ
Citaciones por millón de horas-empleado reportadas. Las tasas comienzan en el año 2000, cuando inician los datos trimestrales de empleo de la MSHA; los incidentes anteriores se cuentan pero no pueden ajustarse por tasa. Los trimestres con menos de 100,000 horas reportadas se muestran en gris: muy pocas horas para una tasa estable.| Trimestre | Horas trabajadas | Citaciones | S&S | Por 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2006 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2005 Q2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 2005 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2000 Q3 | 800 | 15 | 12 | 18750.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 3,297 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Incidentes reportables
69 en archivo1995 · 9 incidentes
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLO
THIS COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.THE COMPNAY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS.THE COMPNAY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DAIGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLO
HEARING LOSS
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE CO THEREFORE CAN NOT REPORT THE CAU SE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCK A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON EE .
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS BACK BLADING ALONG EMBANKMENT WHEN LEFT TRACK HIT PROTRUSION IN EMBANKMENT CAUSING THE DOZER TO STOP SUDDENLY. INJURED STATED HE HAD PAIN IN LOWER BACK AND RIGHT LE G. NOTE: INJURED WAS WEARING SAFETY BELT.
PNEUMOCONIOSIS.
EE STATED HE WAS WALKING DOWN 212 BELT CATWALK, SLIPPED ON A WET SPOT AND FELL ON HIS BOTTOM. VERBAL REPORT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY ON 4-12-95 ACTUAL MEDICAL REPORT RECEIVED ON 4-24-95.
EMPLOYEE ALLEGED THAT HE THOUGHT HE INJURED HIS BACK WHILE LIFTING PUMP PARTS AND HAS EXPERIENCED PAIN IN BACK SINCE. NOTE: DID NOT REPORT THIS ALLEGED INJURY UNTIL 1-18-95. STATED HE WENT TO FAMILY DR. WHERE HE WAS GIVEN PAIN PILLS AND ADVISED TO STAY OFF WORK FOR ONE WEEK. THIS ACCIDENT REPORT IS BEING FILED UNDER PROTEST!
1994 · 7 incidentes
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNISIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNISIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PEROSN' EMPLOYME
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXIST OR THAT THE DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT.
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALELGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATION ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR HTE NATURE OF HTE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THA TIT IS DOUBLTFUL THAT THE ALELGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED B THIS PERSON'S EMPLOY
COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES OT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE O R THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COM OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYEMENT
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE SLIPPED ON ICE & RELL FIRST DAY OFF DUE TO INJURY 02-03-94
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE O R THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE CO OPERATES ITS MINER IN SUCH A MANER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
1993 · 2 incidentes
EE STATED THAT HE WAS CLOSING SHOP DOORS WHEN HE FELT SHARP PAIN IN RT GROIN. HERNIA SURGERY ON OCTOBER 26, 1993.
EE STATED THAT HE WAS REPLACING SCRAPPER ON 211 REFUSE BELT SCRAPPER. FRAME FELL ON ONE END AND PINCHED HIS LEFT INDEX FINGER BETWEEN SCRAPPER FRAME AND BELT FRAME. EE WAS WEARING GLOVES. SEVE N SUTURE, MEDICAL NOT RECEIVED.
1992 · 10 incidentes
THE COMPANY IN ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPO RT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER TAHT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DAIGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EM
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS COMINGDOWN STEPS FROM CAB FOOT SLIPPED HE REACHED BACK WITH RT ARM TO CATCH HANDRAIL & EXPERIENCED PAIN IN RT ELBOW
THE COMPANY IS ONLEY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPO RT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S EMP
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS.THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS.THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAN IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERON'S EMPLOYME
EE STATED HE WAS PULLING DOOR TO CAB OPEN. DOOR WAS CAUGHT ON FLOOR OF CAB JERKED DOOR AND HIT HIM ON MOUTH CHIPPING TOOTH.
54736YEE WAS TRYING TO RAISE SAND GATE ON FROTH CELLS BY PRYING UPWARD WITH SLATE BAR. THE SLATE BAR SLIPPED AND STRUCK EMPLOYEE UNDER CHIN. LACERATION- SUTURES.
DIAGNOSIS;DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE.
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REP ORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES IT'S MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON'S
COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGETHAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALOLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPARIONAL ILLNESS COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYMENT
1991 · 6 incidentes
INJURED STATED THAT HE STRAINED HIS LOWER BACK WHILE LIFTING A 10"-90 DEGREE ELBOW PIPE.
WALKING ALONGSIDE EMPTIES IN EMPTY YARD ON #9 TRACK, STEPPED ON A LUMP OF COAL.
THE CO IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE CO OPERATOES ITS MINES IN SUCK A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSON S EE.
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
CO IS ONLY REPORTING ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS & DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. CO THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT CAUSE OR NATURE OF ALLEGED D IAGNOSIS. CO OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBFUL THAT ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD NAVE BEEN CAUSED BY PERSONS EMPLOYMENT.
EMPLOYEE WAS REMOVING OLD SIDE PLATE FROM SCREEN WITH CHAIN HOISTS.THE SIDE PLATE STRUCK INJURED ON TOP OF HIS LEFT FOOT.
1990 · 6 incidentes
DEGEN DISC DISEASE
JIG ELEVATOR DOOR WAS BEING PULLED CLOSED WITH CHAINFALL.EMPL WAS ASSISTING CREW IN PUTTING BOLTS THROUGH FLANGE WHEN CHAINFALL HOOK SLIPPED AND MOVED UPWARD PINCHING EMPL LEFT FOREFINGER BETW EEN HOOK AND DOOR FLANGE.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS ADJUSTING DOOR ON RAW COAL FEED, WRENCH SLIPPED OUT OF HIS HAND AND STRUCK HIM ON LEFT ELG BETWEEN KNEE AND FOOT.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS FILLING LAWN MOWER WITH GASOLINE GASOLINE SPLATTERED IN EMPLOYEES LEFT EYE NOT SAW DOC ON 07-02-90 & RECEIVED MEDICATION FOR BLISTERS ON HIS EYE
EMPLOYEE WAS LINING A CHUTE WITH TIVAR PLASTIC WEAR PLATE. EMPLOYEE WAS WORKING AND STANDING IN AN AWKWARD POSITION AND EXPERIENCED PAIN IN HIS BACK. NOTE: EMPLOYEE WENT TO A PRIVATE PHYSICIAN . WCCO DID NOT RECEIVE MEDICAL REPORTS OR HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE THAT EMPLOYEE HAD RECEIVED PHYSICAL THERAPY. THE MEDICAL REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AT WCCO ON 5-24-90.
PUSHING A PILE OF REFUSE WITH DOZER. HE HIT A PILE OF SLATE THAT THREW HIM FORWARD AND STRIKING HIS RIGHT HEAD.
1989 · 9 incidentes
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS REPLACING HEAD MOTION ON SCREEN, HEAD MOTION WAS SWINGING ON CHAIN AND FELL STRICKING EMPLOYEE ON RIGHT LEG AT KNEE.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS PRYING ON SPROCKET WITH A BOARD, THE BOARD SLIPPED OFF SPROCKET AND HIT INJURED IN RIGHT RIB. FIRST DAY OFF DUE TO INJURY: 9/18/89. (HEALTH AND SAFETY WAS NOT AWARE OF LOST TIME INJURY UNTIL 9/25/89 WHEN MEDICAL REPTS. RECEIVED.)
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANBY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. (HEARING LOSS)
EMPL INSTALLING NEW BOLTS IN CONE CAP PIECE OF MACHINE-CENTRIFUGE-WITH RATCHET AND SOCKET.EITHER BOLT STRIPPED OUT OR RATCHET/SOCKET SLIPPED CAUSING INJ TO LOSE BALANCE AND FALL TO FLOOR.FX LE FT WRIST.
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS STEPPING DOWN FROM LOADER AND EXPERIENCED PAIN IN LOWER BACK.
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYME
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYME
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYME
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS EXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPORT THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLOYME
1988 · 6 incidentes
CLEANING COAL CHUTE WITH A METAL ROD. ROD STRUCK INJURED IN MOUTH BREAKING OFF TOOTH AT GUM. (FRACTURE TOOTH).
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE SLIPPED ON THE BELT CATWALK AND TWISTED HIS LEFT LEG CAUSING HIS KNEE TO SLIP OUT OF JOINT.
EMPL CARRYING BUCKET OF COAL TO DUMP OUTSIDE WHILE WALKING THROUGH BUILDING.EMPL STEPPED ON SEVERAL LUMPS OF COAL TWISTING ANKLE.FIRST DAY OFF 10-4-88.
ALLEDGED PNEUMOCONIOSIS
EMPLOYEE STATED THAT HE WAS WELDING ON PARTS AHEAD WHEN A SPARK OR SLAG ALLEGEDLY WENT INTO HIS LEFT EAR.
INJURED STATED THAT HE WAS LIFTING ROCK OUT OF SLATE CHUTE WHEN LEFT HAND GAVE WAY, THIS EMPLOYEE HAS STATED THE MGMT THAT THIS WRIST HAS GIVEN HIM PROBLEM FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND THIS WAS NOT FIRST OCCURRENCE OF IT GIVE WAY.
1987 · 2 incidentes
EMPLOYEE ALLEGE8 HE WAS CHANGING BELT SCRAPER WHEN BOLT SLIPPED FROM HANGER CATCHING HIS RIGHT LITTLE FINGER.
STEPPED ON A PI9CE OF METAL AND T WISTED HIS LEFT ANKLE
1986 · 1 incidente
EE ALLEGES HE 4AS SHOVELING BETWEEN BELTS. WHEN SLACK TOOK UP HE WAS PINNED UNDER ROLLER. EE SUSTAINED CRUSHING INJURY TO LEFT LEG.
1985 · 1 incidente
WAS GRINDING ON FIRE PLUG TO WELD ON ADAPTER HADGRINDER KICKED BACK STRIKING LEFT THIGH
1984 · 5 incidentes
INJURED WAS ATTEMPTING TO INSTALL LOCKING PIN INTO AIR-ACTUATED ARM OF SPLITTER GATE. ANOTHER EMPLOYEE WAS OPERATING AIR VALVE WITHIN SIGHT OF THE EMPLOYEE. THE ARM WENT PAST PIN POINT AND CAU GHT INJURED\S FINGER BETWEEN SPLITTER ARM AND STEEL STRUCTURE OF THE FLOOR. INJURED\S MIDDLE FINGER ON HIS RIGHT HAND WAS CUT AND MASHED.
INJURED WAS STANDING APP. 4\ FROM CHAIN HOIST, HOOK SLIPPED UNDER LOAD AND STRUCK INJURED IN HEAD AND FACE.
INJURED WAS PUTTING LINE TOGETHER. COME-A-LONG SLIPPED AND CAUGHT RIGHT FINGER BETWEEN HANDLE AN PIPE
INJURED STATED HE WAS PULLING WELDING LEAD. WELDING LEAD HAD BARE PLACE ON IT CONTACTING METAL BEAM. BURNED RIGHT HAND.
WRENCH BEING HELD BY ANOTHER SLIPPED HITTING HIM IN LEFT EYE.SUTURED.
1983 · 5 incidentes
THE COMPANY IS ONLY REPORTING AN ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS AND DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY ILLNESS IXISTS OR THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS. THE COMPANY THEREFORE CANNOT REPOR T THE CAUSE OR THE NATURE OF THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS. THE COMPANY OPERATES ITS MINES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THE ALLEGED DIAGNOSIS COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THIS PERSONS EMPLL
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
PNEUMOCONIOSIS
FROM INFORMATION RECEIVED IT IS APPARENT THAT INJURED WAS PUTTING SLATE UP IN PLACE TO WELD HIS HAND SLIPPED AND EDGE OF METAL CUT INDEX FINGER
The full compliance file on Bullitt Transloader
A dated report covering the 26-year penalty trail, line-item violation pattern, contest and docket posture, rate-normalized peer benchmark, and full fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.