Crew 2 Operations has $15K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Crew 2 Operations.
Fatalities
0
Total incidents
1
Years on record
2014
Latest incident
May 2014
Compliance record
MSHA citations since 2009
29
citations
13
significant & substantial
$15,260
proposed penalties
$13,054
paid to date
86% of proposed penalties paid to date, a $2,206 gap.
citations per 100 inspection hours
ⓘThis rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.
Rate withheld: 216 inspection hours is too few for a stable rate. A minimum of 1,000 inspection hours is required.
Source: MSHA inspections data, updated weekly.
Crew 2 Operations has $15K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
Penalty disposition
ⓘDifferences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.
$15K
proposed penalties
$13K
current assessed
$13K
paid to date
$0
outstanding
29 assessments are final orders; 2 contested dockets.
Of $9K in penalties contested before the Commission, $6K was upheld in final decisions.
As of the most recent assessment on 2025-06-10.
Source: MSHA assessed-violations and conference/litigation data, updated weekly.
Violation severity profile
ⓘShares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.
Source: MSHA violations gravity and negligence coding, updated weekly.
When citations were contested
ⓘContesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.
10citations taken to the federal commission · 34% of citations on record
Settled
9 · 90%
Vacated or withdrawn
1 · 10%
83%
S&S designation survived the contest
ⓘCounts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.
of 6 decided S&S contests · industry: 79%
28%
Penalty reduction in decided contests
$9K proposed, $6K after decisions · industry: 39%
Source: MSHA Contested Violations file (public record), updated weekly. A dismissed or defaulted contest leaves the citation standing as issued; a vacated or withdrawn citation is removed from the violation record. Latest contest filed 2012-12-12.
Contested penalties
ⓘA reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.
Largest penalties this mine contested before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, with the outcome on record.
Health sampling
ⓘA sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.
Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘMany samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2025-06-10
0%
of limit-tested samples over the exposure limit
8
samples
5
limit-tested
Most sampled contaminants
Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz5
Respirable dust, <.1mg2
Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Show the individual readings (8)
Date
Contaminant
Concentration
Limit
Conc / limit
Occupation
2025-06-10
Respirable dust, <.1mg
0
Crusher Oper/Worker
2025-06-10
Respirable dust, <.1mg
0
Front-end Loader Operator
2023-11-21
Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz
0.19
0.73
0.26
Crusher Oper/Worker
2023-11-21
Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz
0.23
0.86
0.27
Crusher Oper/Worker
2017-04-25
Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz
0.2
0.81
0.25
Crusher Oper/Worker
2017-04-25
Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz
0.13
1.2
0.11
Front-end Loader Operator
2006-05-16
Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz
0.14
Crusher Oper/Worker
2006-05-16
Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz
0.51
1.47
0.35
Crusher Oper/Worker
Source: MSHA respirable dust, quartz, and noise sampling records, updated weekly. Metal/nonmetal contaminant figures come from MSHA's Personal Health Samples and Area Samples files (public record), updated weekly.
Source: MSHA controller and operator history, updated weekly.
Workforce and production
Year
Employees
2026
1
2025
1
2024
0
2023
0
2022
1
2021
1
2020
1
2019
1
2018
2
2017
2
2016
0
2015
1
2014
2
2013
3
2012
2
2011
0
2010
0
2009
0
2008
2
2007
2
2006
2
2005
3
Source: MSHA quarterly employment and production, updated weekly.
Crew 2 Operations sits in Hennepin County, Minnesota, where the Census mining category is 0.0% of county employment.
Local economic context
ⓘCounty figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.
Hennepin County, Minnesota · Population 1,268,903
0.0%
Mining share of county employment
$96,339
Median household income
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2023 5-year estimates.
Quarterly safety rates
ⓘCitations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.
Citations per million employee-hours, as reported to MSHA
2 miners were installing a loader bucket liner. During the process while tack welding a section, the bottom of the jack slipped out of place striking the ee in the ribs. All ee involved were wearing the required PPE. The ee were truing to take extra precaution by eliminating any slippage of jack near the top of the bucket by welding on a strip of steal for the jack to brace against