Employee stated he was repositioning the gear box for the radial stacker which was located on the shop welding table. His left hand slipped and struck a small burr on the gear box resulting in a laceration requiring 12 sutures to the ring finger of the left hand.
Cypress Creek Mine: 126 MSHA citations Coal
Cypress Creek Mine has $31K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 1 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Cypress Creek Mine.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 20
- Years on record
- 1998–2009
- Latest incident
- Feb 2009
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Cypress Creek Mine has $31K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 1 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 1 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAKE 2008-66 | Settlement | Hodgdon | 2008 | $6K → $2K |
MSHA sampling at Cypress Creek Mine shows 99% of 78 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2010-08-24, 16 years ago
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR14
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER13
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE13
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2005-09-27, 20 years ago- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR2
- BLASTER/SHOOTER/SHOTFIRER1
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2010-03-02, 16 years ago
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- BULLDOZER OPERATOR7
- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER6
- BLASTER/SHOOTER/SHOTFIRER5
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.| Year | within 1.5 mg/m3 | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 100% | 11 |
| 2009 | 100% | 13 |
| 2008 | 100% | 14 |
| 2007 | 100% | 5 |
| 2006 | 100% | 10 |
| 2005 | 100% | 5 |
| 2001 | 100% | 10 |
| 2000 | 90% | 10 |
| Year | silica avg (%) | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 11.9 | 1 |
| 2000 | 7.4 | 2 |
| Year | over PEL | samples |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0% | 7 |
| 2009 | 0% | 6 |
| 2007 | 0% | 9 |
| 2005 | 20% | 5 |
| 2001 | 0% | 10 |
| 2000 | 0% | 5 |
Cypress Creek Mine recorded 2.12 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2009.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 * | 2.12 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2008 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2007 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2006 | 2.90 | 1.93 | 0.000 |
| 2005 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2004 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.000 |
| 2003 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2002 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Vigo Coal Company, Inc. 1995 to 2005
- Vigo - Cypress Mine LLC 2005 to present
ⓘ
Coal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.| Year | Employees | Coal produced (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 18 | |
| 2009 | 34 | 127,183 |
| 2008 | 66 | 710,304 |
| 2007 | 69 | 726,669 |
| 2006 | 81 | 1,218,529 |
| 2005 | 74 | 1,360,375 |
| 2004 | 61 | 1,170,468 |
| 2003 | 51 | 1,074,864 |
| 2002 | 52 | 1,168,168 |
| 2001 | 47 | 1,402,323 |
| 2000 | 42 | 1,076,134 |
Cypress Creek Mine sits in Warrick County, Indiana, where the Census mining category is 0.3% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Q1 | 14,932 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 26,072 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 19,040 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 22,044 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 27,048 | 3 | 0 | 110.9 |
| 2008 Q4 | 31,558 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 29,998 | 6 | 1 | 200.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 41,161 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 33 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q1 | 48,340 | 2 | 1 | 41.4 |
| 2007 Q4 | 51,218 | 5 | 0 | 97.6 |
| 2007 Q3 | 48,890 | 19 | 4 | 388.6 |
| 2007 Q2 | 48,682 | 3 | 1 | 61.6 |
| 2007 Q1 | 50,490 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 47,618 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 53,412 | 1 | 0 | 18.7 |
| 2006 Q2 | 51,780 | 4 | 2 | 77.2 |
| 2006 Q1 | 54,178 | 3 | 1 | 55.4 |
| 2005 Q4 | 49,812 | 9 | 4 | 180.7 |
| 2005 Q3 | 53,964 | 6 | 1 | 111.2 |
| 2005 Q2 | 57,786 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 57,881 | 2 | 1 | 34.6 |
| 2004 Q4 | 51,791 | 4 | 3 | 77.2 |
| 2004 Q3 | 40,558 | 5 | 3 | 123.3 |
| 2004 Q2 | 39,100 | 2 | 0 | 51.2 |
| 2004 Q1 | 38,977 | 2 | 1 | 51.3 |
| 2003 Q4 | 36,696 | 1 | 1 | 27.3 |
| 2003 Q3 | 32,336 | 7 | 0 | 216.5 |
| 2003 Q2 | 34,642 | 1 | 0 | 28.9 |
| 2003 Q1 | 41,646 | 4 | 0 | 96.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 40,269 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 33,654 | 1 | 1 | 29.7 |
| 2002 Q2 | 33,067 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 36,814 | 1 | 1 | 27.2 |
| 2001 Q4 | 39,556 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 39,036 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 31,006 | 1 | 0 | 32.3 |
| 2001 Q1 | 30,150 | 3 | 0 | 99.5 |
| 2000 Q4 | 31,921 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 30,893 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 27,956 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 23,285 | 2 | 1 | 85.9 |
Reportable incidents
20 on file2009 · 1 incident
2008 · 1 incident
Employee stated he was in the process of spreading a tarp over the 1800 Hitachi Shovel car-body to keep the rain off the area where the disassembly with was being performed. As he took a step to spread the tarp he slipped on the slick surface causing him to fall backwards striking the middle of his back area on the shovel's roller.
2007 · 1 incident
Employee was using a torch to cut bolts from #6014 dozer track pads when a particle of dirt got under his eye protection and entered his right eye. The employee was taken to Epworth Conenient Care where he was given a prescription eye wash and released to full duty to return to work.
2006 · 3 incidents
EE was driving #6005 85 ton Komatsu truck into the south ramp of #2 pit. He stated the throttle stuck which caused him to drive into rocks at the digging face of the 1800 Hitachi shovel. The impact caused him to strike the visor in the cab which caused a scalp laceration. He also had a contusion to the left hand. He was wearing his seat belt which prevented a more serious injury.
EE stated he was cleaning front windshield on loader, when he slipped and fell on his left side(same level), causing a sprain to the left shoulder. EE said that mud accumulated on his boots, which caused the accident.
EE backed 85 ton haul truck into bucket of 1800 Hitachi Shovel causing a rock to fall into the truck bed. EE alleges the impact of the rock caused a whiplash motion to his neck. There is no lost time from the accident, however he is on restricted duty.
2005 · 1 incident
UNLOADING ASH, PUT BED DOWN, SEEN SOME OF THE ASH HUNG IN BED. MOVED TRUCK, RAISED BED AGAIN, TRUCK TURNED OVER.
2004 · 1 incident
IN AN ATTEMPT TO UNCLOG AUGER ON 6064 MACK POWDER TRUCK THE EE REMOVED THE OR COVER PLATE AND PLACE HIS LEFT HAND INTO THE ROTARING AUGER. RESULTING IN AN AMPUTARIONT TO THE MIDDLE FINGER OF T HE LEFT HAND BETWEEN THE FIRST TWO JOINTS AND LACERATION TO THE RING AND INDEX FINGER OF THE LEFT HAND.
2003 · 3 incidents
MECHANIC WAS CUTTING BOGIE PINS WITH AN ACETYLENE TORCH AND LEFT HAND WAS BY HANDLE OF TORCH. THE HANDLE OF THE TORCH WAS LOOSE ALLOWING OXYGEN TO BUILD UP IN THE GLOVE AND IGNITE.
EMPLOYEE STATED HE WAS PULLING A HYDRAULIC PUMP FROM UNDERNEATH A TABLE WHEN HE FELT PAIN IN LOWER BACK AREA. HE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A SPRAIN BACK - LUMBAR SPINE. (THREE DAY RESTRICTION).
EE STATED THAT WHILE DISMOUNTING THE MAINTENANCE LUBE TRUCK, HIS FOOT SLIPPED OFF THE BOTTOM STEP OF THE OPERATORS CAB CAUSING HIM TO FALL TO THE GROUND. HE STRUCK HIS LEFT ELBOW ON THE GROUND RESULTING IN A CONTUSION. BY DR.'S ORDERS HE WAS RESTRICTED FOR ONE DAY.
2001 · 4 incidents
EE HAD BEEN LOADED WITH MUD BY THE 1800 HITACHI SHOVEL. HE WAS STARTING OUT THE RAMP WHEN THE MUD TRANSFERRED TO THE BACK OF THE BED. THIS CAUSED THE 777 TO RAISE IN THE FRONT. WHEN THE TRUCK CAME DOWN, THE SUDDEN STOP CAUSED HIS HEAD TO WHIP FORWARD & STRIKE THE STEERING WHEEL (10 SUTURES REQUIRED).
THE EE WAS USING A PRY BAR TO DISLODGE A ROCK FROM THE BREAKER. WHEN THE ROCK MOVED THE BAR SLIPPED CAUSING HIM TO FALL APPROX. ONE FOOT. EE LANDED AWKWARDLY ON HIS FEET AND EXPERIENCED A SHAR P PAIN IN THE MIDDLE OF HIS BACK. THE EE MISSED ONE SHIFT BECAUSE THE DR. WASNT IN & HAS BEEN RELEASED FOR FULL DUTY.
EE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF INSTALLING THE FRONT DECK ON THE EUCLID R-190 TRUCK. A CRANE WAS BEING USED TO PERFORM THIS TASK. WHEN THE DECK FREED, IT SWUNG SLIGHTLY TO THE LEFT PINCHING EE'S LEFT HAND AGAINST THE HANDRAIL. (NO FRACTURE, CONTUSION ONLY).
EMPLOYEE HAD BEEN PRYING ON A LODGED ROCK IN THEMACHINE. HE LEANED OVER WITH THE PRY BAR IN HIS HANDS AND FELT PAIN IN LOWER BACK AREA. THIS BECAME REPORTABLE WHEN HE RECEIVED PRESCRIPTION MED ICATION. THERE WAS NO TIME LOST FROM THE JOB.
2000 · 3 incidents
EMPLOYEE WAS STEAMING OFF THE CONCRETE FLOOR OF THE OIL CONTAINMENT AREA. HE APPARENTLY SLIPPED BUT DID NOT FALL ON THE SLICK SURFACE AND STRAINED HIS RIGHT KNEE. X-RAYS WERE NEGATIVE. THE EMP LOYEE HAS HAD SURGERY ON THE RIGHT KNEE FOR AN UNRELATED WORK INJURY.
THE EMPLOYEE WAS REPLACING HYDRAULIC HOSES ON NO6011 DOZER WHEN HE FELT WEAKNESS FROM THE HEAT. HE WAS TREATED WITH COOL WATER TO THE UPPER BODYAND TRANSPORTED TO HOSPITAL WHERE HE WAS KEPT OV ERNIGHT FOR OBSERVATION.
EMPLOYEE WAS ASSISTING TWO OTHER EMPLOYEES ROLLING A 20 FT LONG 48 INCH DIAMETER PIPE INTO POSITION. EMPLOYEE WAS POSITIONED ON THE END OF THE PIPE. AS THE PIPE ROLLED, A JAGGED EDGE OF STEEL FROM THE PIPE PENETRATED THE SIDE OF HIS LEFT HAND. FOUR SUTURES REQUIRED.
1999 · 1 incident
EE WAS REMOVING LINES FROM HELIUM TANK AFTER CHARGIN STRUTS ON R-190. PRESSURE WAS STILL ON LINES WHEN REMOVED. THIS CAUSED A LOAD NOISE NEAR HEIS RT. EAR. EE COMPLAINED OF PARTIAL HEARING LOS S, HOWEVER, IT SEEMS TO BE IMPROVING DAILY.
1998 · 1 incident
AS EE WAS FUELING TANK ON GREASE TRUCK HE SLIPPED ON CAB AND FELL. RESULTING INJURY, A CRACKED RIB. THERE WAS NO TIME LOST FROM THE JOB.