Employee was descending the stairs on a haul unit when EE lost footing on a slick surface. EE grabbed the handrail with left arm and managed to swing self to the ground landing on feet. Pain in back developed over the next few days. Medical visit on 10/27/16.
Georgetown Quarry: 31 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Georgetown Quarry has $4K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 1 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Georgetown Quarry.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 11
- Years on record
- 2008–2016
- Latest incident
- Oct 2016
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Georgetown Quarry has $4K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 1 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 1 · 100%
ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2017-0158 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2017 | $114 → $114 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2023-08-29
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz3
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz2
- Respirable dust, <.1mg2
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz2
Show the individual readings (9)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.66 | Utility Man | ||
| 2023-08-29 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2023-08-29 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.31 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2019-07-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.51 | Utility Man | ||
| 2019-07-30 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.49 | 10 | 0.05 | Utility Man |
| 2019-07-30 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.62 | Utility Man | ||
| 2008-09-24 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.65 | 10 | 0.07 | Truck Driver |
| 2008-09-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2008-09-24 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.27 | 10 | 0.03 | Mechanic |
Georgetown Quarry recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2023.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 24.92 | 9.97 | 0.000 |
- Austin White Lime Company, Ltd. 2008 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 |
| 2023 | 16 |
| 2022 | 15 |
| 2021 | 17 |
| 2020 | 15 |
| 2019 | 19 |
| 2018 | 22 |
| 2017 | 20 |
| 2016 | 25 |
| 2015 | 27 |
| 2014 | 22 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2008 | 10 |
Georgetown Quarry sits in Williamson County, Texas, where the Census mining category is 0.3% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 1,084 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 6,600 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 7,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 7,531 | 1 | 0 | 132.8 |
| 2023 Q2 | 8,350 | 1 | 0 | 119.8 |
| 2023 Q1 | 7,633 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 6,818 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 6,419 | 2 | 0 | 311.6 |
Show 44 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q2 | 7,143 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 7,077 | 1 | 0 | 141.3 |
| 2021 Q4 | 7,844 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 7,986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 7,577 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 7,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 8,189 | 1 | 0 | 122.1 |
| 2020 Q3 | 7,310 | 2 | 0 | 273.6 |
| 2020 Q2 | 7,368 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 9,090 | 1 | 0 | 110.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 9,062 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 9,733 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 10,882 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 10,973 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 10,335 | 1 | 0 | 96.8 |
| 2018 Q3 | 10,917 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 11,506 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 10,606 | 3 | 0 | 282.9 |
| 2017 Q4 | 10,204 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 9,388 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 10,003 | 2 | 0 | 199.9 |
| 2017 Q1 | 10,484 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 10,973 | 4 | 0 | 364.5 |
| 2016 Q3 | 11,496 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 11,733 | 1 | 1 | 85.2 |
| 2016 Q1 | 5,919 | 3 | 0 | 506.8 |
| 2015 Q4 | 10,655 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 10,682 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 11,808 | 2 | 1 | 169.4 |
| 2015 Q1 | 11,982 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 2,915 | 1 | 0 | 343.1 |
| 2011 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2010 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 Q1 | 5,951 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 6,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 4,717 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 2,804 | 1 | 0 | 356.6 |
Reportable incidents
11 on file2016 · 5 incidents
Employee was transferring Brake Parts Cleaner from the 50 Gallon Drum into a 5 Gallon Bucket. As EE was cranking the hand crank attached to the 50 gallon drum the nozzle spun out of place and sprayed a stream of brake cleaner onto the top of the bucket. The brake cleaner splashed up into behind EE's glasses, onto EE's face and into eyes and mouth.
Employee was going up the stairs on P-11 Conveyor Belt when EE slipped at bottom 2nd or 3rd step. EE held the rail with the right hand as EE fell forward and braced self with left hand to keep face from hitting the stairs. The fall pulled on the right shoulder really hard.
Employee was removing a drive shaft from Loader. As EE was lowering the shaft down, it fell to the ground. One end of the shaft landed on top of EE's right hand.
Employee lifted a 5 lbs bucket with tools inside of it (wrenches, hammers etc) from the ground. EE immediately felt pain in EE's lower back. EE requested medical treatment on 1/6/16. Diagnosis: Back sprain.
2015 · 4 incidents
Employee was shoveling spilled material off of the cement pad at the P-13 Conveyor Belt. In the process of shoveling, his left knee began to hurt. He sought medical attention on 12/18/15. Diagnosis: leg sprain
8-22-15 Employee not scheduled to work-seen for medical evaluation due to not feeling well. 8-24-15 Did not report to work due to medical evaluation. 8-25-15 reported to work per medical release-remained in scaleshouse-complained of dizziness-fell to scalehouse floor-transported to medical facility in ambulance. 8-26-15 remains hospitalized diagnosis unknown.
Employee's foot got tangled in the cap wire while loading shots. He tripped, stumbled forward and braced himself from falling using the loading pole. His upper body pushed against the pole and wrenched his arm in an awkward position pulling an arm muscle.
Employee was cleaning up spilled rocks under conveyor. A piece of limestone weighing approx 14 ½ lbs fell approx 35 feet from above, struck him on his hard hat knocking it off employee remained conscious and requested a medical evaluation. Was driven by supervisor to a medical facility. Diagnosis is a mild concussion.
2009 · 1 incident
Employee was getting down from the cab of the truck, stepped onto first step when his foot slipped. he lost his balance and fell striking his left knee against the ground.
2008 · 1 incident
The employee was cleaning spilled material out of a chute. While coming out of the chute he slipped on rocks and twisted his knee.