THE EE WAS SERVICEING A CONVEYOR AT THE TAIL SECITON. EE WAS STANDING ON THE CONVEYOR SECTION WHICH WAS LESS THAN 6" FROM GROUND-LEVEL. EE SLIPPED AND FELL TO THE GROUND. GROUND CONDITIONS WER E WET AND SLIPPERY. EE WALKED THRU THE WET SLIPPERY AREA SURROUNDING THE CONVERYOR WHICH RESULTED IN POOR STABILITY ONCE THE EE STEPPED ONTO THE CONVEYOR PLATFORM. THE EE BACK WAS SORE THE FO
HO-2: 7 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
HO-2 has $395 in proposed MSHA penalties and $60 outstanding across 0 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at HO-2.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 8
- Years on record
- 1990–2002
- Latest incident
- Jul 2002
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.HO-2 has $395 in proposed MSHA penalties and $60 outstanding across 0 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2002-11-13, 23 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz2
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz1
- Respirable dust, <.1mg1
Show the individual readings (4)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-11-13 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | 1.55 | 0.08 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2002-11-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Backhoe Operator | ||
| 2002-11-13 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.37 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2002-11-13 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.31 | Front-end Loader Operator |
HO-2 recorded 8.35 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2002.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 * | 8.35 | 8.35 | 0.000 |
| 2001 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2000 * | 7.26 | 7.26 | 0.000 |
- Waterland Trucking Service Inc 1986 to 2003
- Holloway Companies, Inc. 2004 to 2006
- Screeners Sand & Gravel, Inc. 2006 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 7 |
| 2005 | 4 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2003 | 8 |
| 2002 | 10 |
| 2001 | 11 |
| 2000 | 11 |
HO-2 sits in Oakland County, Michigan, where the Census mining category is 0.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Q4 | 2,571 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 3,137 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 1,127 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 2,354 | 1 | 0 | 424.8 |
| 2005 Q3 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 1,057 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 20 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Q4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2003 Q4 | 5,737 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 6,017 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 2,862 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 2,452 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q4 | 5,683 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 7,132 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 6,986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 4,139 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 6,445 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 9,092 | 5 | 0 | 549.9 |
| 2001 Q2 | 7,840 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 4,009 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 6,853 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 7,583 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 8,051 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 5,065 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
8 on file2002 · 1 incident
2000 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS OPERATING A FRONT END LOADER. EMPLOYEE WAS LOADING A PORTABLE SCREENING PLANT WHENA DISCHARGE CHUTE LOCATED UNDER THE SCREEN PLUGGEE RESULTING IN AN OVERLOADED STRUCTURE. THE EM PLOYEE CHUT THE SCREEN AND WAS ATTEMPTING TO CLEAR THECHUTE WHEN THE STRUCTURE FAILED AS RESULT OF AN OVERLOADED. THE EMPLOYEE WAS STRUCK BY THE CHUTE. EMPLOYEE SUFFERED A BROKEN COLLAR BON
1999 · 1 incident
FILL AREA WAS CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER WHICH CREATED ABRUPT GRADE CHANGES. THE OPERATOR WAS TREATED & RELEASED & WILL RETURN TO WORK IN APPROX 1 WEEK. OPERATORS WERE INSTRUCTED TO EXCERCISE CAUTION CONSTRUCTING FILL AREAS SO AS NOT TO CREATE ABRUPT ELEVATION CHANGES INT HE WORK AREA
1996 · 1 incident
WHILE CUTTING STEEL A RUST FLAKE GOT BEHIND HIS CUTTING GLASSES, IN HIS LEFT EYE. RETURNED TO WORK WITHIN AN HOUR.
1993 · 2 incidents
EMPLOYEE WAS PERFORMING MAINTENANCE WORK ON CONVEYOR. EMPLOYEE INADVERTENTLY PLACED HIS LEFT HAND ON MOVING TAIL PULLEY ON CONVEYOR CAUSIG LEFT HAND TO BE CUT AND BRUISED.
EMPLOYEE WAS FILLING A 300 GALLON PORTABLE DIESEL FUEL TANK FROM A LARGER STORAGE TANK. EMPLOYEE WAS ON TOP OF 300 GALLON PORTABLE TANK WHEN HE SLIPPED AND FELL LANDING ON HIS LEFT WRIST.
1992 · 1 incident
FOREMAN WAS DOING MAINTENANCE WORK. FOREMAN ASKED ANOTHER EE FOR A SCREWDRIVER. THE EE TOSSED SCREWDRIVER. EE REACHED OUT TO CATCH SCREWDRIVER. SCREWDRIVER STRUCK EE ON RIGHT HAND EE DID NOT THINK TOO MUCH ABOUT IT BUT PROBLEM AROSE AT LATER DATE. EE REPORT THIS TO ME ON DEC 16.
1990 · 1 incident
EMPL DRIVING ANOTHER EMPL PERSONAL PICKUP FROM BOTTOM OF PIT TO SCALE HOUSE ON TOP-PLACE OF WORK.RAN INTO PARKED WATER TRUCK PARKED OFF ROADWA.Y. OTHER EMPLOYEES REPORTED EMPL DRIVING ERRATIC ON WAY UP HILL.EMPL CANT GIVE REASON FOR ERRATIC DRIVING OR WHY RAN INTO PARKED WATER TRUCK.