Employee was working with another employee to stack Rotex screen decks when a stack of screen decks on the ground next to them tipped over, contacting their right ankle. The employee was evaluated with an ankle contusion and given light duty restrictions. Employee has not missed any shifts.
Smart Sand Blair LLC: 76 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Smart Sand Blair LLC has $34K in proposed MSHA penalties and $302 outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Smart Sand Blair LLC.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 20
- Years on record
- 2016–2026
- Latest incident
- Mar 2026
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Smart Sand Blair LLC has $34K in proposed MSHA penalties and $302 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 3 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAKE 2016-0298 | Settlement | Barbour | 2016 | $4K → $4K |
| LAKE 2016-0196 | Settlement | Lesnick | 2016 | $1K → $500 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2026-05-20
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz143 over
- Respirable dust, <.1mg4
Show the individual readings (18)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1.04 | 0.35 | 2.97 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2019-01-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 1 | 0.57 | 1.75 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2019-01-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.97 | 0.61 | 1.59 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2026-05-20 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.18 | 0.47 | 0.38 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2026-05-20 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | 0.65 | 0.20 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2026-05-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Building Repair/Maint. | ||
| 2025-09-24 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | Utility Man | ||
| 2025-09-24 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.19 | 0.69 | 0.28 | Lab Technician |
| 2024-09-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.43 | 0.33 | Complete Load-Haul-Dump |
| 2024-09-10 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Sampler, Dust | ||
| 2024-09-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.24 | 0.47 | 0.51 | Cleanup Man |
| 2024-09-10 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.17 | Mechanic | ||
| 2019-07-02 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.15 | 0.5 | 0.30 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2019-07-02 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.24 | 0.64 | 0.38 | Dry Screen Plant Operator |
| 2018-01-03 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Hand Loader | ||
| 2018-01-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.84 | Cleanup Man |
| 2018-01-03 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.57 | Supervisor, Co. Official |
| 2016-10-05 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Lab Technician |
Smart Sand Blair LLC recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 4.74 | 2.37 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 13.57 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 2.60 | 1.30 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2017 | 5.11 | 1.28 | 0.000 |
| 2016 | 3.07 | 1.53 | 0.000 |
- Hi-Crush Blair LLC 2015 to 2022
- Smart Sand Blair LLC 2022 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 63 |
| 2025 | 61 |
| 2024 | 57 |
| 2023 | 43 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2021 | 9 |
| 2020 | 26 |
| 2019 | 74 |
| 2018 | 72 |
| 2017 | 67 |
| 2016 | 70 |
| 2015 | 9 |
Smart Sand Blair LLC sits in Trempealeau County, Wisconsin, where the Census mining category is 0.7% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 35,595 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 33,394 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 30,036 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 33,644 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 30,808 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 30,459 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 30,125 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 29,751 | 2 | 0 | 67.2 |
Show 34 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 29,130 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 31,399 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 27,454 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 26,704 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 24,751 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 5,445 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 616 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2021 Q4 | 2,640 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 2,600 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 5,414 | 3 | 2 | 554.1 |
| 2020 Q4 | 2,796 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 6,319 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 4,728 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 30,387 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 34,806 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 40,184 | 2 | 0 | 49.8 |
| 2019 Q2 | 39,892 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 38,715 | 3 | 0 | 77.5 |
| 2018 Q4 | 36,099 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 40,953 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 39,338 | 2 | 0 | 50.8 |
| 2018 Q1 | 37,497 | 5 | 1 | 133.3 |
| 2017 Q4 | 38,116 | 3 | 1 | 78.7 |
| 2017 Q3 | 39,393 | 3 | 1 | 76.2 |
| 2017 Q2 | 39,302 | 2 | 0 | 50.9 |
| 2017 Q1 | 39,850 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 32,908 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 39,044 | 3 | 1 | 76.8 |
| 2016 Q2 | 37,817 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 20,678 | 2 | 0 | 96.7 |
| 2015 Q4 | 4,971 | 4 | 0 | 804.7 |
| 2015 Q3 | 4,839 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 794 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
20 on file2026 · 2 incidents
On 1/10/26, EE was cleaning a plugged chute and experienced pain in EE's right shoulder. EE evaluated by doctor immediately and was not given any work restrictions that prevented EE from completing EE's normal job duties. On a follow-up appointment on 1/29/26, EE was issued a restriction to be off work.
2023 · 2 incidents
While dismounting from a portable ladder and area during replacement of a conveyor counterweight, an object fell striking miner in the head requiring sutures in two places. Employee was cleared to return to work without any restrictions.
Employee was washing out elevated areas with a high-pressure hose and material fell striking the miner. Employee received a non-conclusive diagnosis of a possible concussion but out of caution was given work restrictions for return as if EE did receive a concussion.
2021 · 1 incident
Employee put foot on rocker panel of truck while attempting to climb inside. Employee's foot slipped off and struck ground spraining employee's right ankle.
2020 · 3 incidents
Employee was using a bar to pry on a scraper. Bar slipped and employee felt a pop in right shoulder. Employee reported the incident and said that the shoulder was sore but fine and did not want to seek medical treatment. 2 and 2 days weeks later on 2-13-20 employee decided to seek treatment. No clear diagnosis was given, but employee did receive restrictions.
Employee kneeling to tag a rail car and slipped on hard snow/ice. Sprained left ankle.
Employee felt discomfort in eye on 1/6/2020 after repeated flushing with no relief on 1/7/2020 employee reported discomfort to supervisor. Employee was seen at eye clinic where a small piece of metal was removed from the eye.
2019 · 2 incidents
Employee was making a rail switch and strained right arm. Employee sought medical attention the following day and was given restrictions.
Employee was checking belts and slipped on ice resulting in hitting head on the ground. Employee has previous medical non work related history with head injuries, and is off work for continued evaluations.
2018 · 2 incidents
Cage from baghouse slipped through employee's hand causing a laceration
Employee was walking on top of a rail car when fall protection device became snagged on the supporting structure. This caused employee to be stopped mid stride while stepping from one car to the next. This caused employee to lose balance and fall between the cars. Total fall before arrest by retractable lanyard was approximately 4 feet.
2017 · 5 incidents
Employee circumvented accepted practices for adjusting feed to the head chute of "B" 80 by climbing on a shield rather than using a ladder. When employee was getting down employee felt a pain in right ankle
The employee was descending a metal stair way and misjudged the last step thinking ee was at the ground. The employee stated that ee was looking around the plant when this happened and not fully focused on the stairs. It was dark out and ee may have cast a shadow over the bottom stair as ee descended.
Employee received UV burn to eyes from looking at another employee welding
Employee was attempting to get a strap around a broken blow bar when the bar dislodged from the backing and pinched left thumb against a rotor. EE went to have an X-Ray and shows a potential hairline fracture of thumb.
EE began having chest pain at 9p after climbing stairs that went away. At 11p more pain came after taking stairs to top of silo. EE came off silo and sat in control room to rest. EE was unsure what was causing the pain, but was told to go in by co workers. EE drove to ER and there was diagnosed with a heart attack. Stint was placed. EE stated that DR said EE had 99% blockage.
2016 · 3 incidents
Employee was bending a piece of tin siding flashing, the flashing slipped and hit EE's right wrist causing a laceration that required five stitches.
Employee was loading tin onto a trailer and twisted left knee. Employee finished the rest of shift and reported the injury the next day.
While rewinding a hose reel finger was pinched causing a laceration to EE's left hand middle finger.