AFTER FAILED ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE MATERIAL WEDGE IN THE PRIMARY JAW CRUSHER, WORKERS CLEARED THE AREA AND STARTED THE MACHINE. SEVERAL ROCKS FLEW OUT FROM THE TOP OF THE CRUSHER AND STRUCK A MIN ER, WHO WAS STANDING APPROX. 10' AWAY FROM THE EQUIPMENT ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE. APPARENTLY, ONE ROCK KNOCKED THE MINER'S HARD HAT OFF WHILE ANOTHER ROCK STRUCK THE EE'S FOREHEAD CAUSING A LAC
WWC #2521: 100 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
WWC #2521 has $68K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 6 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at WWC #2521.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 13
- Years on record
- 1991–2002
- Latest incident
- Feb 2002
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.WWC #2521 has $68K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 6 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 1 · 50%
- Stood as issued 1 · 50%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT20020283M | Settlement | Hodgdon | 2003 | $21K → $15K |
| CENT20020282M | Settlement | Hodgdon | 2003 | $16K → $12K |
| CENT20030204M | Settlement | Feldman | 2003 | $15K → $11K |
| CENT20020284M | Settlement | Hodgdon | 2003 | $2K → $2K |
| CENT 2007-294M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2008 | $124 → $60 |
| CENT 2008-166M | Dismissal | Lesnick | 2008 | $100 → $100 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2005-10-26, 20 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz3
Show the individual readings (3)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-10-26 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.36 | 2.31 | 0.16 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2005-10-26 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.53 | 2.46 | 0.22 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2005-10-26 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.5 | 2.71 | 0.18 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
WWC #2521 recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2007.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2002 * | 5.59 | 5.59 | 0.000 |
| 2001 * | 37.46 | 14.05 | 0.000 |
| 2000 * | 4.08 | 4.08 | 0.000 |
- Saiz Sand & Gravel 1950 to 1989
- Blaze Construction Inc 1989 to 1997
- W W C Inc 1997 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2008 | 10 |
| 2007 | 9 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2005 | 6 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2003 | 6 |
| 2002 | 26 |
| 2001 | 45 |
| 2000 | 44 |
WWC #2521 sits in Lincoln County, New Mexico, where the Census mining category is 1.5% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q4 | 3,269 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 6,291 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 3,701 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 4,935 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 5,679 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 5,885 | 1 | 0 | 169.9 |
| 2007 Q2 | 5,477 | 10 | 2 | 1825.8 |
| 2007 Q1 | 3,142 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 28 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Q4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 287 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 296 | 6 | 2 | 20270.3 |
| 2005 Q3 | 2,181 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 2,112 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 3,062 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 3,209 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2004 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2003 Q4 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 2,791 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 2,963 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 1,758 | 7 | 2 | 3981.8 |
| 2002 Q4 | 438 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 4,233 | 5 | 1 | 1181.2 |
| 2002 Q2 | 13,054 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 18,045 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 12,404 | 50 | 21 | 4031.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 14,418 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 7,815 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 8,077 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 12,624 | 8 | 6 | 633.7 |
| 2000 Q3 | 19,739 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 12,356 | 13 | 6 | 1052.1 |
| 2000 Q1 | 4,247 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
13 on file2002 · 1 incident
2001 · 8 incidents
TWO MINERS WERE WORKING INSIDE AN ELECTRICAL CONTROL BOX WHILE THE GENERATOR WAS RUNNING. ALTHOUGH THE MAIN POWER DISCONNECTS HAD BEEN SHUT OFF,THERE WAS STILL AN ELECTRICAL LOAD ON THE LINE DUE TO IMPROPER WIRING OF THE CIRCUIT. THE MINERWAS BURNED FROM AN ELECTRICAL FLASH AND ENSUING FIRE WHEN THE OTHER MINER ATTEMPTED TO CONNECT THE LIVE WIRE TO A BREAKER BOX.
TWO MINERS WERE WORKING INSIDE AN ELECTRICAL CONTROL BOX, WHILE THE GENERATOR WAS RUNNING. ALTHOUGH THE MAIN POWER DISCONNECTS HAD BEEN SHUT OFF, THERE WAS STILL AN ELECTRICAL LOAD ON THE LINE DUE TO IMPROPER WIRING OF THE CIRCUIT. THE MINERWAS INJURED WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO CONNECT A LIVE WIRE TO A BREAKER BOX CAUSING AN ELECTRICAL FLASH FIRE.
THE MINER WAS INJURED WHILE ASSISTING TWO INJURED CO-WORKERS AND FIGHTING AN ENSUING ELECTRICAL FIRE. THE EMPLOYEE RECEIVED MINOR BURNS FROM SPARKS AND/OR SPLATTERING MATERIAL WHILE BATTLING THE BLAZE.
THE MINER SUFFERED MILD SMOKE INHALATION FROM BATTLING AN ELECTRICAL FIRE INSIDE A CONTROL TRAILER. THE EMPLOYEE WAS SENT TO THE LOCAL HOSPITAL FOR EVALUATION AND RELEASED THE SAME DAY.
BOLTING A PIECE OF ANGLE IRON ON THE DISCHARGE CHUTE OF A SCREENING PLANT. THE INJURED EMPLOYEEWAS KNEELING ON TOP A PIECE OF PLYWOOD WHILE ANOTHER EMPLOYEE WAS HAMMERING ON THE EQUIPMENT BE LOW. APPARENTLY, VIBRATIONS FROM THE POUNDING DISLODGED A ROCK, CAUSING IT TO FALL FROM THE SCREEN AND STRIKE THE EMPLOYEE ON THE CHEST. THE EMPLOYEE LOST BALANCE AND FELL OFF EQUIPMENT.
EMPLOYEE WAS MANUALLY DIGGING/CLEANING PUG MILL HOPPER FEED WITH A SHOVEL. APPARENTLY, SUFFERED A HEAT STROKE WHEN HE STOPPED TO GET A DRINK OF WATER. ACCORDING TO THE SUPERVISOR, THE EMPLOYEE SUDDENLY LOST CONTROL OF BODILY FUNCTIONS AND MUSCLE CONTROL. THE EMPLOYEE ENDURED VIOLENT SIEZURES/MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS WHILE ON ROUTE TO THE HOSPITAL.HE LOST CONSCIOUSNESS AS WELL.
EMPLOYEE WAS DISLODGING A ROCK FROM A TAIL PULLEY WITH A BAR WHILE THE EQUIPMENT WAS SHUT OFF. AAS THE EE PUSHED ON THE BAR, IT SLIPPED WHEN THE ROCK BROKE FREE. THE EE'S HAND STRUCK THE METAL SCREEN/GUARD, WHICH PUNCTURED HIS HAND. THE EE RECIEVED APPROX 5 STITCHES OR SUTURES.
THE V-BELTS UNDER THE IMPACT CONVEYOR WAS NOT MOVING BECAUSE IT WAS SLIPPING. THE EE THOUGHT THE DEVICE WAS SHUTOFF AND HE COULDN'T HEAR THE MOTOR RUNNING. THE EE REACHED IN TO SHAKE THE BELT. THE BELT SUDDENLY CAUGHT AND TOOK OFF CRUSHING THE EMPLOYEE'S FINGERS IN THE DEVICE.
2000 · 1 incident
EE WAS SHOVELING & THE SHOVEL JAMMED HIM UNDER THIS LEFT ARM
1998 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS TIGHTENING A BOLT ON TOP OF A LOADER TRANSMISSION WHEN THE BOLT STRIPPED OUT. THE EMPLOYEE WAS PUSHING WITH HIS RIGHT ARM.
1992 · 1 incident
EE WAS SHOVELING BY A CONVEYOR & A ROCK HIT HIM ON THE SHOULDER
1991 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS USING A SLEDGE HAMMER AND MISSED A PIN AND HIT RIGHT ELBOW.