Mining Incidents

Craig K Jackson: 213 MSHA citations controller

MSHA controller ID: C15477

Watch this controller

Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at any mine Craig K Jackson controls.

Fatalities
0
Total incidents
104
Mines on record
3
Years on record
1996–2000
Compliance record
MSHA citations since 2000
213
citations
102
significant & substantial
$53,577
proposed penalties
$10,111
paid to date
19% of proposed penalties paid to date, a $43,466 gap.
Source: MSHA violations data, updated weekly.
Inspection activity
MSHA inspections since 2000
66
inspections on record
1,579
inspection hours
13.5
citations per 100 inspection hours
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.
213 citations across 1,579 inspection hours.
Source: MSHA inspections data, updated weekly.
Penalty disposition
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.
$54K
proposed penalties
$29K
current assessed
$10K
paid to date
$19K
outstanding
203 assessments are final orders; 23 contested dockets.
Of $34K in penalties contested before the Commission, $10K was upheld in final decisions.
As of the most recent assessment on 2003-04-01.
Source: MSHA assessed-violations and conference/litigation data, updated weekly.
Violation severity profile
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.
49.8%
significant & substantial
7.9%
high negligence or reckless
49.3%
reasonably likely or greater
7.9%
permanently disabling or fatal if injury occurs
Negligence coding: 0.0% none, 1.0% low, 91.1% moderate, 7.9% high, 0.0% reckless.
Source: MSHA violations gravity and negligence coding, updated weekly.
Injury rate, 2000
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.
48.13
total case rate
41.85
days-away rate
0.000
fatality rate
Above average. The US coal mining average was 7.74 and the all-US-mining average was 5.64 cases per 100 workers.
Under 100,000 employee-hours were reported that year, so a single case moves the rate by two or more. Read the figure as approximate.
Source: injury cases from MSHA accident and injury records; employee-hours from MSHA quarterly employment reports. Rate is cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers, operator employees only.
Health sampling
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.

Respirable coal dust
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.

Last sampled: 2020-08-21, 6 years ago
97%
within 1.5 mg/m3
77
samples
3.31
dust max (mg/m3)
0
over MSHA ECV
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.
39 samples taken by MSHA inspectors, 38 by the operator.
Most-sampled occupations
  • CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR18
  • REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE11
  • MOBILE BRIDGE OPERATOR8

Silica (quartz)

Last sampled: 2000-07-26, 26 years ago
4.1
silica avg (%)
3
samples
10.2
silica max (%)
Most-sampled occupations
  • COAL TRUCK DRIVER1
  • CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR1
  • REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE1

Noise
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.

Last sampled: 2020-08-19, 6 years ago
6%
over PEL
17
samples
Most-sampled occupations
  • HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER8
  • BULLDOZER OPERATOR2
  • MOBILE BRIDGE OPERATOR2
Source: MSHA respirable dust, quartz, and noise sampling records, updated weekly.
Contested penalties
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.
Largest penalties this controller contested before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, with the outcome on record.
Docket Decision Judge Year Proposed / upheld
CENT20000007 Prevail Barbour 2001 $13K → $3K
CENT20000428 Prevail Barbour 2001 $4K → $740
CENT20000474 Prevail Barbour 2001 $3K → $1K
CENT20000426 Prevail Barbour 2001 $2K → $700
CENT20000263 Prevail Barbour 2001 $2K → $690
CENT20000291 Prevail Barbour 2001 $2K → $655
Source: FMSHRC civil penalty dockets and decisions (public record), updated weekly.

Top causes

Incident timeline

2000
26
1999
38
1998
24
1997
12
1996
4

Operators under this controller

Mines on record

For insurers, brokers, and safety consultants

Where Craig K Jackson stands on silica, penalties, and injury rate

MSHA's standard limits respirable silica to 50 micrograms per cubic metre, but MSHA publishes dust and quartz as separate files and never the silica figure itself. We derive it per sample, score it against the limit, and set the operator's injury rate against a benchmark built from the full MSHA operator record. With the 26-year penalty trail, contest posture, and fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.

The federal record itself stays free on this site. What costs money, and why.

See a sample report
Need a different cut of the data? Ask us