WHILE OPERATING ROCK TRUCK EMPLOYEE BACKED OVER DUMP AREA.
Harry J Hanchar: 2 recorded fatalities controller
Watch this controller
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at any mine Harry J Hanchar controls.
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 7.97 | 7.97 | 0.000 |
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 5.81 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 4.76 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 | 6.94 | 6.94 | 0.000 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Respirable coal dust
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2026-06-18
ⓘ
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.ⓘ
The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.- UTILITY MAN297
- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR241
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR206
Silica (quartz)
Last sampled: 2025-12-08- HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR26
- UTILITY MAN25
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR14
Noise
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Last sampled: 2026-06-17
ⓘ
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.- HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER79
- BULLDOZER OPERATOR74
- REFUSE TRUCK DRIVER/BACKFILL TRUCK DRIVE70
ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 139 · 99%
- Stood as issued 2 · 1%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN 2009-28 | Settlement | Barbour | 2010 | $148K → $40K |
| PENN 2009-623 | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $130K → $93K |
| PENN 2009-16 | Settlement | Barbour | 2010 | $59K → $22K |
| PENN 2008-156 | Settlement | Barbour | 2009 | $32K → $12K |
| PENN 2008-229 | Settlement | Barbour | 2009 | $14K → $2K |
| PENN 2009-294 | Settlement | Barbour | 2010 | $10K → $4K |
Top causes
- POWERED HAULAGE 1 fatality · 10 non-fatal
- MACHINERY 1 fatality · 9 non-fatal
- HANDLING OF MATERIALS 44 non-fatal
- SLIP OR FALL OF PERSON 37 non-fatal
- HANDTOOLS (NONPOWERED) 14 non-fatal
- FIRE 5 non-fatal
Incident timeline
Operators under this controller
Mines on record
Fatalities under this controller
2 recordedA MECHANICAL FAILURE OF THE 3500 HITACHI SHOVEL CAUSED THE VALVE SPOOL TO BE THROWN THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE CAB RESULTING IN THE DEATH OF THE EMPLOYEE
Where Harry J Hanchar stands on silica, penalties, and injury rate
MSHA's standard limits respirable silica to 50 micrograms per cubic metre, but MSHA publishes dust and quartz as separate files and never the silica figure itself. We derive it per sample, score it against the limit, and set the operator's injury rate against a benchmark built from the full MSHA operator record. With the 26-year penalty trail, contest posture, and fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.
The federal record itself stays free on this site. What costs money, and why.