Employee had a 2" high pressure water line blow out. Pressure of the water pushed him over handrail, causing him to fall 34 feet. Employee landed on an electrical tray, then rolled off, falling to the ground. **EE was hospitalized multiple times due to his injuries and he died on July 26, 2012**
Chico 2 Quarry: 1 recorded fatality Metal/Non-Metal
Chico 2 Quarry has $126K in proposed MSHA penalties and $299 outstanding across 4 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Chico 2 Quarry.
- Fatalities
- 1
- Total incidents
- 19
- Years on record
- 2010–2024
- Latest incident
- Jul 2024
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Chico 2 Quarry has $126K in proposed MSHA penalties and $299 outstanding across 4 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 9 · 82%
- Vacated or withdrawn 1 · 9%
- Still open 1 · 9%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2021-0207 | Settlement | Bulluck | 2023 | $47K → $13K |
| CENT 2013-450M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2013 | $2K → $2K |
| CENT 2013-451M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2013 | $585 → $585 |
| CENT 2026-0116 | Decision pending |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2021-05-06, 5 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz21 over
- Respirable dust, <.1mg5
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz4
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz2
Show the individual readings (13)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-10-05 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 41.46 | 10 | 4.15 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2021-05-06 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2021-05-06 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2014-05-21 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Utility Man |
| 2014-05-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2014-05-21 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2014-05-21 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.13 | 10 | 0.01 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2011-12-13 | Nuisance dust, total, <1% Qtz | 6.82 | 10 | 0.68 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2011-10-05 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.32 | 1.19 | 0.27 | Utility Man |
| 2011-10-05 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.41 | 1.17 | 0.35 | Utility Man |
| 2010-09-15 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 1.03 | 0.14 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2010-09-15 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Backhoe Operator | ||
| 2010-09-15 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.13 | 1.08 | 0.12 | Utility Man |
Chico 2 Quarry recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 2.39 | 2.39 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 3.04 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 7.73 | 2.58 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 5.70 | 2.85 | 0.000 |
- Blue Star Materials LLC 2010 to 2013
- Blue Star Materials II LLC 2013 to 2018
- Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC 2018 to 2023
- P&K Stone LLC 2023 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 44 |
| 2025 | 36 |
| 2024 | 40 |
| 2023 | 24 |
| 2022 | 24 |
| 2021 | 25 |
| 2020 | 26 |
| 2019 | 26 |
| 2018 | 24 |
| 2017 | 38 |
| 2016 | 40 |
| 2015 | 33 |
| 2014 | 30 |
| 2013 | 15 |
| 2012 | 17 |
| 2011 | 43 |
| 2010 | 25 |
Chico 2 Quarry sits in Wise County, Texas, where the Census mining category is 4.7% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 17,579 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 19,893 | 6 | 0 | 301.6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 19,495 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 18,073 | 4 | 0 | 221.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 15,996 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 20,730 | 1 | 0 | 48.2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 20,173 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 17,390 | 3 | 0 | 172.5 |
Show 56 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 22,793 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 23,499 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q4 | 13,213 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 16,373 | 4 | 1 | 244.3 |
| 2023 Q2 | 12,600 | 1 | 0 | 79.4 |
| 2023 Q1 | 2,647 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 11,965 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 16,048 | 3 | 1 | 186.9 |
| 2022 Q2 | 18,323 | 3 | 0 | 163.7 |
| 2022 Q1 | 19,095 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 18,086 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 15,400 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 16,599 | 7 | 5 | 421.7 |
| 2021 Q1 | 18,764 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q4 | 18,073 | 1 | 1 | 55.3 |
| 2020 Q3 | 17,177 | 12 | 2 | 698.6 |
| 2020 Q2 | 17,417 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 13,179 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 21,680 | 2 | 0 | 92.3 |
| 2019 Q3 | 21,105 | 3 | 0 | 142.1 |
| 2019 Q2 | 17,927 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 16,955 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 12,947 | 3 | 1 | 231.7 |
| 2018 Q3 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 26,672 | 3 | 0 | 112.5 |
| 2018 Q1 | 28,758 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 33,409 | 6 | 0 | 179.6 |
| 2017 Q3 | 37,943 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 40,976 | 9 | 3 | 219.6 |
| 2017 Q1 | 33,357 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 32,913 | 10 | 4 | 303.8 |
| 2016 Q3 | 31,924 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 28,384 | 7 | 2 | 246.6 |
| 2016 Q1 | 25,537 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 29,822 | 6 | 1 | 201.2 |
| 2015 Q3 | 33,714 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 29,680 | 11 | 5 | 370.6 |
| 2015 Q1 | 27,987 | 7 | 3 | 250.1 |
| 2014 Q4 | 23,215 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 19,447 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 22,928 | 2 | 0 | 87.2 |
| 2014 Q1 | 24,444 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 16,010 | 8 | 4 | 499.7 |
| 2013 Q2 | 10,849 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 7,007 | 1 | 1 | 142.7 |
| 2012 Q4 | 7,069 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 6,832 | 5 | 1 | 731.9 |
| 2012 Q2 | 6,404 | 8 | 3 | 1249.2 |
| 2012 Q1 | 24,013 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 25,509 | 10 | 1 | 392.0 |
| 2011 Q3 | 30,075 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 20,690 | 15 | 8 | 725.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 20,537 | 18 | 13 | 876.5 |
| 2010 Q4 | 20,624 | 2 | 1 | 97.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 14,379 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 11,335 | 9 | 6 | 794.0 |
Fatalities at this mine
1 recordedReportable incidents
18 on file (excluding fatalities above)2024 · 2 incidents
While servicing a tire on the left front of a WA600, the technician placed a hydraulic ram between the axle suspension assembly of the WA600 and the inside flange of the wheel. When the bead of the tire came loose from the force of the ram pushing on the flange, the ram slipped and hit the technician in the face.
EE was operating a haul truck, hauling clay to the dump. EE dismounted the cab of the haul truck and walked toward the excavator's work area unannounced. At this point a chunk of clay came off the face and struck the EE in question on the outer right thigh. EE was seen by company clinic and was issued work restrictions.
2020 · 1 incident
EE was changing a screen on the top west tertiary screen. EE was using a pry bar and put left foot for pressure on the pry bar to loosen the screen, while the right foot was used for balance and support behind EE. EE felt a pop in the left ankle and it began to swell up.
2019 · 3 incidents
IE was helping the operator of a skid loader change the bucket. The operator blocked the bucket but the release lever jammed and they could not release the bucket. Another EE had the operator raise the bucket so EE could hit the lever with a wooden block. The lever released the bucket, then falling onto both feet of IE causing a contusion.
Employee injured wrist while using a shovel to clean up spillage at the secondary crusher plant
3 employees and 1 contractor were working on the freshwater pump. They uncoupled the pump from the pipe to turn the valve around when the barge started to sink on one side. The employees/contractor climbed off the barge and swam to shore. The injured employee cut L middle finger while climbing off, requiring 2 stitches.
2018 · 3 incidents
Employee working under a conveyor when the electrician's pulling cable and knocked a rock off the cable tray and struck employee's hard hat. Rock punctured the hard hat and cut the back of employee's head. Employee received 4 staples in head.
The screen bearing locked up employee was grabbing the v-belts to unlock the bearing when it came unlocked rolling their fingers in between the sheave and v-belts then employee pulled their finger out
EE was cutting belting with a razor knife blade got stuck cutting EE's hand threw EE's glove
2017 · 1 incident
EE was cleaning under the sand belt that feeds the tertiary and a rock fell from the belt that feeds the double screen hit ee on lower back.
2016 · 1 incident
Employee was cleaning a chute on the primary and a large rock fell on right foot. Employee went to the doctor on 04/06/2016 and was put on restricted duty.
2013 · 1 incident
Employee stepped out of the truck stepped on a rock while exiting the truck experiencing back pain afterwards.
2012 · 2 incidents
aneurysm
EE suffered an acute internal derangement and or degernerative joint disease by twisting his knee while working on the west twin screens.
2011 · 2 incidents
Employee was dismounting the loader at the end of his shift when stepping off last step to the ground his foot was placed on a loose rock. He twisted his ankle.
******(Was not reportable till 7/17) While getting into the truck, hit head (had hard had on) on the door framing, jamming his neck.
2010 · 2 incidents
Employee was working on a pump. The employee was pulling on a discharge hose when he lost his footing and tripped. Employee stated he was fine and returned to work.
Employee was dismounting his loader and his foot missed the bottom step. He fell approximately 30 feet to the ground landing on his feet and jarring his back. The attending physician diagnosed the injury as a simple sprain and prescribed pain medication and rest. Employee was told he could return to his normal duties on his next scheduled work day.