citations per 100 inspection hours
ⓘThis rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.
Rate withheld: 897 inspection hours is too few for a stable rate. A minimum of 1,000 inspection hours is required.
Source: MSHA inspections data, updated weekly.
No 1 Strip has $3K in proposed MSHA penalties and $1 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
Penalty disposition
ⓘDifferences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.
$3K
proposed penalties
$3K
current assessed
$3K
paid to date
$1
outstanding
24 assessments are final orders; 2 contested dockets.
Of $1K in penalties contested before the Commission, $1K was upheld in final decisions.
As of the most recent assessment on 2019-05-16.
Source: MSHA assessed-violations and conference/litigation data, updated weekly.
Violation severity profile
ⓘShares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.
Source: MSHA violations gravity and negligence coding, updated weekly.
When citations were contested
ⓘContesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.
2citations taken to the federal commission · 8% of citations on record
Settled
2 · 100%
100%
S&S designation survived the contest
ⓘCounts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.
of 1 decided S&S contests · industry: 79%
19%
Penalty reduction in decided contests
$1K proposed, $1K after decisions · industry: 39%
Source: MSHA Contested Violations file (public record), updated weekly. A dismissed or defaulted contest leaves the citation standing as issued; a vacated or withdrawn citation is removed from the violation record. Latest contest filed 2014-03-06.
Contested penalties
ⓘA reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.
Largest penalties this mine contested before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, with the outcome on record.
MSHA sampling at No 1 Strip shows 100% of 89 respirable coal dust samples met the 1.5 mg/m3 standard.
Health sampling
ⓘA sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.
Respirable coal dust
ⓘRespirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Last sampled: 2019-12-18, 6 years ago
100%
within 1.5 mg/m3
89
samples
0.99
dust max (mg/m3)
0
over MSHA ECV
ⓘThe excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.
87 samples taken by MSHA inspectors, 2 by the operator.
Noise
ⓘThe share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.
Health sampling trend
ⓘA sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.
Respirable coal dust by year
ⓘRespirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.
Source: MSHA controller and operator history, updated weekly.
Workforce and production
ⓘCoal production is reported quarterly and lags the current period; the most recent quarters may be incomplete.
Year
Employees
Coal produced (tons)
2020
0
2019
1
2018
0
2017
0
2016
4
2015
8
2014
5
2013
2
3,347
2012
2
8,620
2011
3
9,264
2010
3
16,836
2009
3
9,198
2008
4
29,863
2007
4
35,862
2006
4
58,367
2005
5
62,793
2004
5
54,239
2003
5
32,525
2002
5
36,621
2001
4
30,361
2000
3
24,535
Source: MSHA quarterly employment and production, updated weekly.
No 1 Strip sits in Allegany County, Maryland, where the Census mining category is 0.1% of county employment.
Local economic context
ⓘCounty figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.
Allegany County, Maryland · Population 67,762
0.1%
Mining share of county employment
$57,393
Median household income
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2023 5-year estimates.
Quarterly safety rates
ⓘCitations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.
Citations per million employee-hours, as reported to MSHA
Quarter
Hours worked
Citations
S&S
Per 1M hrs
2020 Q3
0
0
0
2020 Q2
0
0
0
2020 Q1
0
0
0
2019 Q4
0
0
0
2019 Q2
471
2
1
4246.3
2019 Q1
0
0
0
2018 Q4
0
0
0
2018 Q3
0
0
0
Show 74 earlier quartersHide earlier quarters
Quarter
Hours worked
Citations
S&S
Per 1M hrs
2018 Q2
0
0
0
2018 Q1
0
0
0
2017 Q4
0
0
0
2017 Q3
0
0
0
2017 Q2
0
0
0
2017 Q1
0
0
0
2016 Q4
0
0
0
2016 Q3
0
0
0
2016 Q2
8
0
0
0.0
2016 Q1
25
0
0
0.0
2015 Q4
19
0
0
0.0
2015 Q3
4
0
0
0.0
2015 Q2
10
0
0
0.0
2015 Q1
1,470
0
0
0.0
2014 Q4
0
0
0
2014 Q3
20
0
0
0.0
2014 Q2
8
0
0
0.0
2014 Q1
20
0
0
0.0
2013 Q4
96
0
0
0.0
2013 Q3
0
0
0
2013 Q2
547
0
0
0.0
2013 Q1
677
0
0
0.0
2012 Q4
1,062
0
0
0.0
2012 Q3
1,121
0
0
0.0
2012 Q2
1,053
1
1
949.7
2012 Q1
1,087
2
1
1839.9
2011 Q4
1,105
0
0
0.0
2011 Q3
1,314
1
0
761.0
2011 Q2
1,717
0
0
0.0
2011 Q1
1,682
2
2
1189.1
2010 Q4
1,612
0
0
0.0
2010 Q3
1,596
0
0
0.0
2010 Q2
1,575
0
0
0.0
2010 Q1
1,478
0
0
0.0
2009 Q4
1,448
3
2
2071.8
2009 Q3
1,441
0
0
0.0
2009 Q2
1,442
0
0
0.0
2009 Q1
1,768
0
0
0.0
2008 Q4
1,673
0
0
0.0
2008 Q3
2,634
0
0
0.0
2008 Q2
2,399
0
0
0.0
2008 Q1
2,291
0
0
0.0
2007 Q4
2,174
4
1
1839.9
2007 Q3
2,079
0
0
0.0
2007 Q2
2,214
0
0
0.0
2007 Q1
2,222
0
0
0.0
2006 Q4
2,259
0
0
0.0
2006 Q3
2,145
0
0
0.0
2006 Q2
2,139
0
0
0.0
2006 Q1
2,178
0
0
0.0
2005 Q4
2,215
0
0
0.0
2005 Q3
2,109
0
0
0.0
2005 Q2
2,339
0
0
0.0
2005 Q1
2,432
0
0
0.0
2004 Q4
2,065
0
0
0.0
2004 Q3
2,201
0
0
0.0
2004 Q2
2,283
1
0
438.0
2004 Q1
2,278
0
0
0.0
2003 Q4
2,637
0
0
0.0
2003 Q3
2,275
1
1
439.6
2003 Q2
2,081
1
0
480.5
2003 Q1
2,345
0
0
0.0
2002 Q4
2,178
0
0
0.0
2002 Q3
1,925
0
0
0.0
2002 Q2
2,204
1
1
453.7
2002 Q1
2,052
0
0
0.0
2001 Q4
2,356
0
0
0.0
2001 Q3
1,702
0
0
0.0
2001 Q2
1,424
1
1
702.2
2001 Q1
1,740
0
0
0.0
2000 Q4
1,226
3
0
2447.0
2000 Q3
1,082
0
0
0.0
2000 Q2
1,199
0
0
0.0
2000 Q1
1,210
0
0
0.0
No fatalities recorded at this mine.
Reportable incidents
3 on file
2014 · 1 incident
July 31, 2014MD · Coalmaintenance man, mechanic, repair/serviceman, boilermaker, fueler, tire tech, field service techMACHINERY
Employee was exiting his truck at the scales to weigh. When he stepped down on the bottom step, it broke, throwing him backwards and he hit his head and shoulder on the platform. He passed out for about 3-4 minutes. Employee was taken to the ER by the supervisor. This resulted in a concussion and a shoulder contusion.
2009 · 1 incident
September 24, 2009MD · Coalbulldozer operator, universal operator, heavy equipment operator, operating engineerHANDLING OF MATERIALS
Employee was adjusting a round hay bale as it was being put in the mulcher. Used left arm to push on bale and arm became stuck in hay bale as it was moving, pulling arm, resulting in some pulled muscles.