Mining Incidents

CNS MINING, INC.: 260 MSHA citations operator

Controlled by Stacy Roberts
MSHA operator ID: P22815

Watch this operator

Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at any CNS MINING, INC. mine.

Fatalities
0
Total incidents
8
Mines on record
3
Years on record
1994–2003
Compliance record
MSHA citations since 2003
260
citations
153
significant & substantial
$79,705
proposed penalties
$0
paid to date
0% of proposed penalties paid to date, a $79,705 gap.
Source: MSHA violations data, updated weekly.
Inspection activity
MSHA inspections since 2002
42
inspections on record
941
inspection hours
n/a
citations per 100 inspection hours
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.
Rate withheld: 941 inspection hours is too few for a stable rate. A minimum of 1,000 inspection hours is required.
Source: MSHA inspections data, updated weekly.
Penalty disposition
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.
$80K
proposed penalties
$80K
current assessed
$0
paid to date
$80K
outstanding
247 assessments are final orders; 0 contested dockets.
As of the most recent assessment on 2003-12-09.
Source: MSHA assessed-violations and conference/litigation data, updated weekly.
Violation severity profile
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.
61.4%
significant & substantial
5.2%
high negligence or reckless
61.4%
reasonably likely or greater
7.2%
permanently disabling or fatal if injury occurs
Negligence coding: 0.0% none, 0.4% low, 94.4% moderate, 5.2% high, 0.0% reckless.
Source: MSHA violations gravity and negligence coding, updated weekly.
Health sampling
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.

Respirable coal dust
Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.

Last sampled: 2003-12-02, 22 years ago
84%
within 1.5 mg/m3
76
samples
11.49
dust max (mg/m3)
40 samples taken by MSHA inspectors, 36 by the operator.
Most-sampled occupations
  • CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR21
  • ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (INTAKE SIDE)5
  • ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (RETURN SIDE)5

Silica (quartz)

Last sampled: 2003-12-10, 22 years ago
8.9
silica avg (%)
7
samples
12.4
silica max (%)
Most-sampled occupations
  • CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR2

Noise
The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.

Last sampled: 2003-05-27, 23 years ago
0%
over PEL
5
samples
Most-sampled occupations
  • CONTINUOUS MINER OPERATOR1
  • HIGHLIFT OPERATOR/FRONT END LOADER1
  • ROOF BOLTER (TWIN HEAD) (INTAKE SIDE)1
Source: MSHA respirable dust, quartz, and noise sampling records, updated weekly.

Top causes

Incident timeline

2003
2
1995
3
1994
3

Mines on record

For insurers, brokers, and safety consultants

Where CNS MINING, INC. stands on silica, penalties, and injury rate

MSHA's standard limits respirable silica to 50 micrograms per cubic metre, but MSHA publishes dust and quartz as separate files and never the silica figure itself. We derive it per sample, score it against the limit, and set the operator's injury rate against a benchmark built from the full MSHA operator record. With the 26-year penalty trail, contest posture, and fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.

The federal record itself stays free on this site. What costs money, and why.

See a sample report
Need a different cut of the data? Ask us