Mining Incidents

The Coteau Properties Company: 1 recorded fatality operator

Controlled by NACCO Industries Inc
MSHA operator ID: P08947

The Coteau Properties Company has had 1 fatality among 326 reportable incidents since 1983. MSHA has proposed $32K in penalties since 2001, with $959 outstanding.

Watch this operator

Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at any The Coteau Properties Company mine.

Fatalities
1
Total incidents
326
Mines on record
1
Years on record
1983–2026
Compliance record
MSHA citations since 2001
149
citations
16
significant & substantial
$32,380
proposed penalties
$30,631
paid to date
95% of proposed penalties paid to date, a $1,749 gap.
Source: MSHA violations data, updated weekly.
Inspection activity
MSHA inspections since 2000
102
inspections on record
7,380
inspection hours
2.0
citations per 100 inspection hours
ⓘ This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.
149 citations across 7,380 inspection hours.
Source: MSHA inspections data, updated weekly.
Penalty disposition
ⓘ Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.
$32K
proposed penalties
$32K
current assessed
$31K
paid to date
$959
outstanding
126 assessments are final orders; 2 contested dockets.
Of $4K in penalties contested before the Commission, $3K was upheld in final decisions.
As of the most recent assessment on 2026-07-31.
Source: MSHA assessed-violations and conference/litigation data, updated weekly.
Violation severity profile
ⓘ Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.
10.8%
significant & substantial
0.7%
high negligence or reckless
10.8%
reasonably likely or greater
30.4%
permanently disabling or fatal if injury occurs
Negligence coding: 0.0% none, 42.6% low, 56.8% moderate, 0.7% high, 0.0% reckless.
Source: MSHA violations gravity and negligence coding, updated weekly.
Injury rate, 2025
ⓘ This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000 and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year. Employment reports reach back to 1983, but those earlier years come from MSHA's archived file format and are not used in rates.
0.61
total case rate
0.40
days-away rate
0.000
fatality rate
Below average. The US coal mining average was 3.19 and the all-US-mining average was 1.98 cases per 100 workers.
Year total case rate days-away fatal
2026 0.40 0.40 0.000
2025 0.61 0.40 0.000
2024 0.84 0.42 0.000
2023 0.43 0.21 0.000
2022 0.23 0.00 0.000
2021 0.24 0.00 0.000
2020 1.14 0.23 0.000
2019 0.67 0.67 0.000
Source: injury cases from MSHA accident and injury records; employee-hours from MSHA quarterly employment reports. Rate is cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers, operator employees only.
Health sampling
ⓘ A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.

Respirable coal dust
ⓘ Respirable coal dust and silica figures cover coal facilities. Dust compliance is measured against the current 1.5 mg/m3 standard; samples predating the 2014 standard are included, so compliance rates are a coarse historical signal.

Last sampled: 2026-08-18
99%
within 1.5 mg/m3
591
samples
5.12
dust max (mg/m3)
0
over MSHA ECV
ⓘ The excessive concentration value (ECV) is MSHA's own per-sample enforcement threshold, which builds in measurement uncertainty; a sample over its ECV can trigger a citation. The count covers only samples MSHA assigned an ECV.
317 samples taken by MSHA inspectors, 274 by the operator.
Most-sampled occupations
  • BULLDOZER OPERATOR272
  • COAL DRILL OPERATOR78
  • HIGHWALL DRILL OPERATOR70

Silica (quartz)

Last sampled: 2017-01-10, 9 years ago
4.9
silica avg (%)
3
samples
9.1
silica max (%)
Most-sampled occupations
  • WELDER (NON-SHOP)3

Noise
ⓘ The share counts noise samples whose measured dose exceeded the 90 dBA permissible exposure limit. It describes the sampled workplace, not what reached the miner's ear: hearing conservation programs and the hearing protection worn during the shift are recorded separately and are not reflected here.

Last sampled: 2026-08-18
4%
over PEL
223
samples
Most-sampled occupations
  • BULLDOZER OPERATOR61
  • ROAD GRADER OPERATOR21
  • OILER/GREASER16
Source: MSHA respirable dust, quartz, and noise sampling records, updated weekly.
When citations were contested
ⓘ Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.
3 citations taken to the federal commission · 2% of citations on record
  • Settled 2 · 67%
  • Still open 1 · 33%
0%
S&S designation survived the contest
ⓘ Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.
of 2 decided S&S contests · industry: 79%
22%
Penalty reduction in decided contests
$4K proposed, $3K after decisions · industry: 39%
Source: MSHA Contested Violations file (public record), updated weekly. A dismissed or defaulted contest leaves the citation standing as issued; a vacated or withdrawn citation is removed from the violation record. Latest contest filed 2026-09-27. Vacated and withdrawn citations are removed from the file this view attributes through, so that outcome is slightly undercounted here.
Contested penalties
ⓘ A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.
Largest penalties this operator contested before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, with the outcome on record.
Docket Decision Judge Year Proposed / upheld
CENT 2014-0293 Settlement Miller 2014 $4K → $3K
CENT 2026-0291 Decision pending
Source: FMSHRC civil penalty dockets and decisions (public record), updated weekly.

Top causes

Incident timeline

2026
1
2025
3
2024
5
2023
2
2022
1
2021
1
2020
6
2019
4
2018
4
2017
3
2016
1
2015
7
2014
4
2013
9
2012
5
2011
11
2010
9
2009
4
2008
5
2007
5
2006
4
2005
3
2004
6
2003
7
2002
13
2001
6
2000
11
1999
2
1998
10
1997
9
1996
14
1995
14
1994
13
1993
14
1992
17 (1f)
1991
12
1990
8
1989
18
1988
11
1987
9
1986
7
1985
8
1984
7
1983
13

Mines on record

Fatalities under this operator

1 recorded
November 24, 1992 ND · Coal front-end loader, scraper-loader operator, pan operator, payloader, scraper rig operator Fatality · POWERED HAULAGE
The Coteau Properties Company · Struck against a moving object

A FLEET OF SCRAPERS WAS HAULING SUBSOIL TO A STOCKPILE.TWO CAT 651 SCRAPERS COLLIDED HEAD-ON ON THE HAUL ROAD.THE HAUL ROAD WAS WIDE ENOUGH TO HANDLE THE TRAFFIC.THE HAUL ROAD WAS IN GOOD COND ITION AND VISIBILITY WAS GOOD.IT APPEARS THAT THE MAN THAT WAS FATALLY INJURED WAS ON THE WRONG LANE.

For insurers, brokers, and safety consultants

Where The Coteau Properties Company stands on silica, penalties, and injury rate

MSHA's standard limits respirable silica to 50 micrograms per cubic metre, but MSHA publishes dust and quartz as separate files and never the silica figure itself. We derive it per sample, score it against the limit, and set the operator's injury rate against a benchmark built from the full MSHA operator record. With the 26-year penalty trail, contest posture, and fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.

The federal record itself stays free on this site. What costs money, and why.

See a sample report
Need a different cut of the data? Ask us