Employee was helping with jump starting sand pump motor with booster cables. Engine would not start. Cables were removed. Battery started smoking and exploded seconds later. Employee was struck in face by debris and battery fluid. Has left eye injury. Eye is better. Expected back at work next week.
Hammett Gravel Company-Yazoo: 149 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Hammett Gravel Company-Yazoo has $120K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 10 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Hammett Gravel Company-Yazoo.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 14
- Years on record
- 1987–2015
- Latest incident
- Oct 2015
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Hammett Gravel Company-Yazoo has $120K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 10 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 36 · 95%
- Stood as issued 1 · 3%
- Vacated or withdrawn 1 · 3%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE 2009-999M | Settlement | Lewis | 2011 | $29K → $20K |
| SE 2009-501M | Settlement | Moran | 2012 | $22K → $15K |
| SE 2008-91M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2008 | $13K → $9K |
| SE 2009-1000M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2010 | $9K → $3K |
| SE 2010-603M | Settlement | Gilbert | 2011 | $8K → $7K |
| SE 2011-140M | Settlement | Tureck | 2011 | $7K → $4K |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2012-10-25, 13 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Respirable dust, <.1mg4
- Arsenic fumes2
- Beryllium fumes2
- Cadmium oxide fumes2
Show the individual readings (34)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-10-25 | Zinc oxide fumes | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Manganese fumes | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Molybdenum fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Nickel fumes | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Vanadium fumes | 0 | 50 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Dredge/Barge Operator | ||
| 2012-10-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Hydrating Plant Operator | ||
| 2012-10-25 | Arsenic fumes | 0.37 | 500 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Beryllium fumes | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Cadmium oxide fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Chromium, insoluble | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Cobalt fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Copper fumes | 0.22 | 100 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Iron oxide fumes | 0.03 | 10 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Lead fumes | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Magnesium oxide fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Manganese fumes | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Molybdenum fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Nickel fumes | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Vanadium fumes | 0 | 50 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Zinc oxide fumes | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Arsenic fumes | 0.27 | 500 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Beryllium fumes | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Cadmium oxide fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Chromium, insoluble | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Cobalt fumes | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Copper fumes | 0.1 | 100 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Iron oxide fumes | 0.01 | 10 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Lead fumes | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2012-10-25 | Magnesium oxide fumes | 0 | 10 | 0.00 | Utility Man |
| 2005-01-04 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2005-01-04 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2005-01-04 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.18 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2005-01-04 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.27 | Washer Operator |
Hammett Gravel Company-Yazoo recorded 6.28 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2015.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 * | 6.28 | 6.28 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 5.23 | 5.23 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 4.30 | 4.30 | 0.000 |
| 2009 * | 4.75 | 4.75 | 0.000 |
| 2008 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Apac-Mississippi Inc 1950 to 1981
- Petermann Gravel Inc 1981 to 1984
- Hammett Gravel Company Inc 1984 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 10 |
| 2015 | 14 |
| 2014 | 17 |
| 2013 | 18 |
| 2012 | 18 |
| 2011 | 18 |
| 2010 | 21 |
| 2009 | 18 |
| 2008 | 18 |
| 2007 | 18 |
| 2006 | 16 |
| 2005 | 12 |
| 2004 | 12 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2002 | 9 |
| 2001 | 11 |
| 2000 | 11 |
Hammett Gravel Company-Yazoo sits in Yazoo County, Mississippi, where the Census mining category is 0.7% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Q2 | 5,096 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 6,376 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 6,330 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 9,394 | 4 | 0 | 425.8 |
| 2015 Q2 | 9,109 | 1 | 0 | 109.8 |
| 2015 Q1 | 7,028 | 2 | 0 | 284.6 |
| 2014 Q4 | 11,451 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 11,273 | 1 | 0 | 88.7 |
Show 58 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Q2 | 10,439 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 8,275 | 1 | 0 | 120.8 |
| 2013 Q4 | 9,558 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 9,869 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 10,768 | 1 | 0 | 92.9 |
| 2013 Q1 | 9,420 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 10,551 | 2 | 0 | 189.6 |
| 2012 Q3 | 10,529 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 9,607 | 3 | 0 | 312.3 |
| 2012 Q1 | 9,144 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 8,710 | 3 | 0 | 344.4 |
| 2011 Q3 | 10,190 | 5 | 0 | 490.7 |
| 2011 Q2 | 9,642 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 9,708 | 3 | 1 | 309.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 10,728 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 12,874 | 4 | 3 | 310.7 |
| 2010 Q2 | 12,686 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 10,212 | 4 | 3 | 391.7 |
| 2009 Q4 | 9,333 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 11,519 | 19 | 6 | 1649.4 |
| 2009 Q2 | 10,819 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 10,453 | 7 | 1 | 669.7 |
| 2008 Q4 | 10,339 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 10,943 | 5 | 4 | 456.9 |
| 2008 Q2 | 12,269 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 10,580 | 3 | 2 | 283.6 |
| 2007 Q4 | 10,530 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 10,983 | 12 | 4 | 1092.6 |
| 2007 Q2 | 11,337 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 12,261 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 11,939 | 18 | 6 | 1507.7 |
| 2006 Q3 | 12,770 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 10,082 | 1 | 0 | 99.2 |
| 2006 Q1 | 6,768 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 5,479 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 8,519 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 8,092 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 9,588 | 3 | 2 | 312.9 |
| 2004 Q4 | 6,674 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,078 | 5 | 2 | 706.4 |
| 2004 Q2 | 7,503 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 6,959 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 7,582 | 15 | 9 | 1978.4 |
| 2003 Q3 | 7,155 | 1 | 1 | 139.8 |
| 2003 Q2 | 8,210 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 6,202 | 1 | 1 | 161.2 |
| 2002 Q4 | 5,575 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 6,410 | 6 | 2 | 936.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 7,806 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 7,028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 7,221 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 8,646 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 8,741 | 3 | 2 | 343.2 |
| 2001 Q1 | 5,900 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 5,938 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 7,546 | 2 | 1 | 265.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 6,780 | 11 | 5 | 1622.4 |
| 2000 Q1 | 6,988 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
14 on file2015 · 1 incident
2011 · 1 incident
Employee was was working with drilling crew drilling for gravel on lands adjacent to mining area. Employee attempted to lift a drill bit by hand that had fallen a few inches below the reach of the drill track bit attachment. In attempting to lift the bit, employee strained his lower back. Supervisor had gone to get a chain to attach to the bit to lift it.
2010 · 1 incident
Employee was operating a Caterpillar D-6rxl dozer. He hit a bump or rough spot that jarred him and caused him to whiplash hurting his lower back. He continued to work. He sought out a chiropractor on 1/25. He has continued to work everyday and the only time he has missed has been for chiropractor visits. After 3 visits he states his back is sore but is better
2009 · 1 incident
Employee was helping unload a hydraulic jack from the back of a service truck. He pulled the front of the jack out of the truck. Before other employee could grab other end the jack fell out of the truck with the injured employee holding one end. After 3 days of physical therapy his back is better.
2007 · 1 incident
EE was attempting to replace a leaking 3" water hose on the dredge. He took a hacksaw and began to try to cut the hose. He had performed this task in the past. When he cut into the hose the water/coolant was under pressure and sprayed onto his left arm causing some possible second degree burns. He went to the doctor and had some bandages applied. He was back to work the next day.
2006 · 3 incidents
Injured employee and another employee were loading a piece of 8" pipe into the back of a truck. Injured employee's right thumb got caught between the lifting eye on the 8" pipe and the tailgate of the truck as the pipe was slid into the back of the truck. His right thumb was mashed breaking the tip of the bone in his thumb and causing the nail to come off.
Injured EE along with two other EE's was preparing to overhaul the sand pump. The plate and suction side liner are held in place by 24 bolts and nuts. According to employees it is customary to remove all the bolts and nuts from the plate and side liner then attach a chain to the plate and side liner. In most cases the plate and side liner.
EE had just begun the 2nd day of restricted duty from acc. in 2005. EE was operating the sand catching plant. The job involves opening and closing a valve periodically by using a lever which is manipulated on a horizontal plane to control flow of sand and water. EE heard something pop in his back when he moved the lever right to left. Pain in back and left leg.
2005 · 1 incident
EE WAS WORKING NEAR AND WITH 2 WELDERS. THEY WERE WORKING ON A TROUGH AT THE SAND PLANT. EE APPARENTLY WAS EXPOSED ACCIDENTALLY TO THE WELDING FLASH, THUS INJURING HIS EYES.
2000 · 1 incident
INJURED WAS HELPING INSTALL A CLUTCH ON A 671 ENGINE ON OUR DREDGE. CLUTCH WAS INSTALLED WITH AID OF HOIST AND CHAIN. AFTER CLUTCH WAS INSTALLED, WHILE THE ENGINE WAS NOT RUNNING, EMPLOYEE REA CHED INTO TOP OF CLUTCH TO REMOVE THE CHAIN. AN EMPLOYEE NEARBY LOST HIS BALANCE AND STRUCK THE CLUTCH LEVER ENGAGING THE CLUTCH AND SEVERING THE TIP OF INJURED'S FINGER.
1998 · 1 incident
EE WAS HOISTED IN LOADER BUCKET APPROX 10-12 FT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL TO PUT A PIPE WITH A TORCH. EE LOST HIS BALANCE AND FELL FROM THE BUCKET TO THE GROUND
1997 · 1 incident
EE WAS WORKING ON GRAVEL HOPPER. HE WAS STANDING UNDER THE HOPPER ON THE GROUND PULLING ON A CONVEYOR BELT. HIS RIGHT LEG SLIPPED AND HE FELL TO THE GOUND TRAPPING THE LOWER PORTION OF HIS LEF T LEG UNDER HIM THIS PART STRESS ON HIS LEFT KNEE STRAINING IT.
1989 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE A SCRAPER OPERATOR WAS ASSISTING WELDERWELDING ON THE SCRAPER HE OPERATES HIS EYE RECEIVED MINER BURNS FROM FLASH OF WELDER DOC EXAMINED EYE & PUT PATCH ON IT FOR COUPLE OF DAYS THERE WAS NO SERIOUS OR PERMANENT DAMAGE
1987 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS BA7KING CRANE OFF OF LOWBOY. HE WAS HALWAY OFF LOWBOY CRANE WHEN FRONT WHEELS SLIPPED ON WET LOWBOY TIRES AND CRANE SLID SIDE TO SIDE AND TURNED OVER ON ITS SIDE WITH EMPLOYEE IN CAB. 3