Employee was lifting a hydraulic pump and felt a pop in his back. Caused back pain and numbness and tingling into his legs.
Pit #50: 47 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Pit #50 has $6K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 1 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Pit #50.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 16
- Years on record
- 1993–2015
- Latest incident
- Feb 2015
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.Pit #50 has $6K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 1 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 1 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2011-696M | Settlement | Paez | 2012 | $540 → $410 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2016-09-20, 9 years ago
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Respirable dust, <.1mg6
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz1
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Show the individual readings (8)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2011-04-19 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.12 | 10 | 0.01 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2011-04-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2011-04-19 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Crusher Oper/Worker | ||
| 2005-08-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2005-08-25 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2005-08-25 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.22 | Dredge/Barge Operator |
Pit #50 recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2017.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2016 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2015 * | 7.66 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2014 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2013 * | 11.42 | 5.71 | 0.000 |
| 2012 * | 6.78 | 6.78 | 0.000 |
| 2011 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2010 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Martin Marietta Aggregates 1993 to 1998
- Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Company 1998 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2017 | 9 |
| 2016 | 11 |
| 2015 | 12 |
| 2014 | 12 |
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2012 | 11 |
| 2011 | 11 |
| 2010 | 10 |
| 2009 | 9 |
| 2008 | 9 |
| 2007 | 9 |
| 2006 | 11 |
| 2005 | 9 |
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2003 | 4 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2001 | 6 |
| 2000 | 7 |
Pit #50 sits in Douglas County, Nebraska, where the Census mining category is 0.0% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Q4 | 2,662 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 6,394 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 7,024 | 2 | 0 | 284.7 |
| 2017 Q1 | 7,765 | 1 | 0 | 128.8 |
| 2016 Q4 | 10,847 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 11,184 | 3 | 0 | 268.2 |
| 2016 Q2 | 7,122 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 3,960 | 2 | 0 | 505.1 |
Show 64 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Q4 | 6,587 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 6,971 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 8,671 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 3,875 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 6,498 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 8,459 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 11,406 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 5,073 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 9,016 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 11,091 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 8,485 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 6,435 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 6,849 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 10,339 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 7,796 | 1 | 0 | 128.3 |
| 2012 Q1 | 4,524 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 6,775 | 2 | 1 | 295.2 |
| 2011 Q3 | 10,297 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 7,768 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 4,657 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 7,883 | 1 | 0 | 126.9 |
| 2010 Q3 | 8,450 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 6,562 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 4,156 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 6,939 | 3 | 0 | 432.3 |
| 2009 Q3 | 7,507 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 7,822 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 4,148 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 6,997 | 6 | 0 | 857.5 |
| 2008 Q3 | 6,632 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 6,581 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 5,409 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q4 | 5,679 | 2 | 0 | 352.2 |
| 2007 Q3 | 6,933 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 7,423 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 5,088 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 6,849 | 3 | 0 | 438.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 9,195 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 8,283 | 4 | 2 | 482.9 |
| 2006 Q1 | 5,611 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 6,241 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 6,951 | 9 | 0 | 1294.8 |
| 2005 Q2 | 7,025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 6,362 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 6,241 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 9,557 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 8,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 3,862 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 4,092 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2003 Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2002 Q4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2002 Q3 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q2 | 211 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 952 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 3,962 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 4,511 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q2 | 3,690 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 918 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q4 | 5,124 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 5,113 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q2 | 5,168 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 3,414 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
16 on file2015 · 1 incident
2013 · 2 incidents
Swinging a sledge hammer on some ice buildup over the conveyor base when he lost grip of the hammer, causing his left pinky finger to be smashed in between the hammer and the frame. he reports the bottom half of his fingernail is "popped back" with a "blood blister" noted to the side of the affected finger.
Employee was walking up a hill with a tool box. The tool box broke, causing the employee to fall to the ground.
2012 · 1 incident
Employee was climbing down a ladder and a piece of iron fell from the top of the ladder striking him in the left foot.
2010 · 2 incidents
Former employee told his supervisor that he hurt his right shoulder in a bar fight in March 2010, but he was being treated for right shoulder pain before this because of his job, told supervisor on 6/21/10
Employee was terminated on Monday June 14, 2010. It was after he was terminated that he told his supervisor that he was hosing down a walkway and fell backwards, straining his lower back.
2009 · 1 incident
When changing screens on the rotary, the employee's right index finger tip was pinched between the hoisting chain and the rotary. The employee's finger nail was removed and sutured.
2008 · 2 incidents
Using a pry bar to line up bolt holes on rubber hose for dredge pipe line, pry bar pinched right middle finger, required stitches.
The employee was pushing the plastic fusing machine by hand with a lot of force and felt immediate pain in back of right lower leg, in the calf area. Received medical attention, RX for pain and muscle relaxant and several days of restricted work activity.
2002 · 1 incident
THE EE WAS HELPING TO DISMANTLE THE DREDGE WHEN DOING SO HE MOVED A FLANGED PIPE THAT SLID AND TIPPED OUT OF THE SADDLE PINCHING AND SEVERING THE END OF THE EE'S RIGHT THUMB BETWEEN THE PIPE FRAME AND CORNER OF THE DREDGE CABIN. THE EE HAD SURGERY ON 9-6-02 TO PIN BONE ON THE END OF THE THUMB.
1996 · 1 incident
EMPLOYEE WAS CHECKIGN A HOSE CONNECTION FROM THE BANK ONT HE PIPELIEN COMING IN FROM THE DREDGE WHEN HE SLIPPED AND FELL CAUSING CONTUSIONS TO HIS RIGHT HAND, HIP, AND SHOULDER.
1995 · 3 incidents
EMPLOYEE WAS BURNED WHILE BURNING A BRUSH PILE, CAUSING FIRST AND SECOND DEGREE BURNS TO HIS HANDS, ARMS AND FACE.
EE WAS CUTTING FLASHING RUBBER WHEN UTILITY KNIFE SLIPPED AND CUT HIS LEFT ARM, REQUIRING 3 STITCHES.
EMPLOYEE WAS USING ELECTRIC IMPACT TO TIGHTEN THE NUTS ON A COVER PLATE FOR THE SAND SCREW WHEN A PIECE OF STEEL CAME OFF OF THE NUT AND GOT INTO THE CORNER OF THE EMPLOYEES EYE. EMPLOYEE HAD TO HAVE PIECE REMOVED BY A PHYSICIAN.
1994 · 1 incident
WHILE ATTEMPTING TO LIFT A CLUTCH PART HE STRAINED HIS LOWER BACK.
1993 · 1 incident
THE EE RUBBED A LARGE DEEP BLISTER ON HIS HEEL DUE TO ILL FITTING BOOTS A PREVIOUS MEDICAL CONDITION WAS READERED THE FOOT WITH NO FEELING.