Employee attempted to do a spot weld without properly positioning welding helmet. EE suffered irritation to both eyes. EE was welding on a gravel trailer.
Coxburg Sand & Gravel: 244 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Coxburg Sand & Gravel has $103K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 3 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Coxburg Sand & Gravel.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 13
- Years on record
- 2004–2019
- Latest incident
- Dec 2019
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Coxburg Sand & Gravel has $103K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 3 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 13 · 100%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE 2008-92M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2008 | $32K → $9K |
| SE 2007-167M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2007 | $2K → $1K |
| SE 2011-87M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $1K → $572 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2025-09-24
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Respirable dust, <.1mg16
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz4
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz4
Show the individual readings (24)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2025-09-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2025-09-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2019-01-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2019-01-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2019-01-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Utility Man | ||
| 2019-01-24 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2012-06-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2012-06-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2012-06-13 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.79 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2012-06-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Belt Crew | ||
| 2012-06-13 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Belt Crew | ||
| 2011-03-30 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 1.3 | Utility Man | ||
| 2011-03-30 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.16 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2011-03-30 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2003-12-16 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2003-12-16 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2003-12-16 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.24 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2003-12-16 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.68 | Crusher Oper/Worker |
| 2003-12-16 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.25 | 2.28 | 0.11 | Laborer, Bullgang |
| 2003-01-28 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.15 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2003-01-28 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator | ||
| 2003-01-28 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.73 | 2.86 | 0.26 | Front-end Loader Operator |
| 2003-01-28 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Washer Operator |
Coxburg Sand & Gravel recorded 0.00 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 8.97 | 8.97 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 11.78 | 11.78 | 0.000 |
- Hammett Gravel Company Inc 2001 to 2024
- APAC-MS, INC. 2024 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 31 |
| 2025 | 24 |
| 2024 | 20 |
| 2023 | 18 |
| 2022 | 19 |
| 2021 | 22 |
| 2020 | 18 |
| 2019 | 18 |
| 2018 | 21 |
| 2017 | 22 |
| 2016 | 14 |
| 2015 | 14 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2013 | 11 |
| 2012 | 14 |
| 2011 | 15 |
| 2010 | 14 |
| 2009 | 11 |
| 2008 | 12 |
| 2007 | 13 |
| 2006 | 13 |
| 2005 | 13 |
| 2004 | 13 |
| 2003 | 12 |
| 2002 | 11 |
| 2001 | 11 |
Coxburg Sand & Gravel sits in Yazoo County, Mississippi, where the Census mining category is 0.7% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 8,667 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7,575 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7,866 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9,630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8,474 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10,144 | 2 | 0 | 197.2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 9,574 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 11,753 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 92 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 11,802 | 2 | 1 | 169.5 |
| 2024 Q1 | 9,649 | 2 | 0 | 207.3 |
| 2023 Q4 | 10,006 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 10,533 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 11,361 | 3 | 0 | 264.1 |
| 2023 Q1 | 10,205 | 14 | 3 | 1371.9 |
| 2022 Q4 | 10,409 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 11,969 | 8 | 0 | 668.4 |
| 2022 Q2 | 12,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 10,555 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 14,007 | 7 | 2 | 499.8 |
| 2021 Q3 | 13,275 | 1 | 0 | 75.3 |
| 2021 Q2 | 12,866 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 13,032 | 2 | 0 | 153.5 |
| 2020 Q4 | 14,076 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 10,774 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 9,673 | 6 | 3 | 620.3 |
| 2020 Q1 | 9,022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 10,495 | 5 | 1 | 476.4 |
| 2019 Q3 | 11,494 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 11,153 | 5 | 1 | 448.3 |
| 2019 Q1 | 11,460 | 7 | 2 | 610.8 |
| 2018 Q4 | 11,050 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 13,604 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 13,727 | 7 | 1 | 509.9 |
| 2018 Q1 | 12,537 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 13,417 | 11 | 2 | 819.9 |
| 2017 Q3 | 13,528 | 8 | 4 | 591.4 |
| 2017 Q2 | 13,702 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 14,302 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q4 | 9,353 | 3 | 1 | 320.8 |
| 2016 Q3 | 8,645 | 3 | 1 | 347.0 |
| 2016 Q2 | 9,447 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 7,683 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 8,373 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 10,175 | 1 | 1 | 98.3 |
| 2015 Q2 | 8,031 | 4 | 1 | 498.1 |
| 2015 Q1 | 6,003 | 6 | 3 | 999.5 |
| 2014 Q4 | 9,442 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 10,389 | 2 | 1 | 192.5 |
| 2014 Q2 | 8,480 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 7,777 | 3 | 0 | 385.8 |
| 2013 Q4 | 6,841 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 5,548 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 5,751 | 3 | 2 | 521.6 |
| 2013 Q1 | 5,386 | 1 | 0 | 185.7 |
| 2012 Q4 | 7,163 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 7,084 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 8,017 | 6 | 0 | 748.4 |
| 2012 Q1 | 6,745 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 7,860 | 3 | 0 | 381.7 |
| 2011 Q3 | 8,552 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 9,178 | 5 | 3 | 544.8 |
| 2011 Q1 | 6,670 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,985 | 3 | 0 | 429.5 |
| 2010 Q3 | 8,993 | 3 | 2 | 333.6 |
| 2010 Q2 | 8,927 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q1 | 6,298 | 1 | 0 | 158.8 |
| 2009 Q4 | 4,845 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q3 | 8,189 | 3 | 1 | 366.3 |
| 2009 Q2 | 6,718 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q1 | 5,717 | 5 | 0 | 874.6 |
| 2008 Q4 | 6,434 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q3 | 7,467 | 3 | 2 | 401.8 |
| 2008 Q2 | 7,750 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 6,570 | 4 | 2 | 608.8 |
| 2007 Q4 | 7,676 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 8,138 | 7 | 5 | 860.2 |
| 2007 Q2 | 9,428 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 9,253 | 14 | 8 | 1513.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 7,984 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 8,921 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 8,397 | 6 | 2 | 714.5 |
| 2006 Q1 | 7,510 | 10 | 6 | 1331.6 |
| 2005 Q4 | 9,687 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 8,390 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 7,545 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 6,210 | 4 | 0 | 644.1 |
| 2004 Q4 | 6,100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,191 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 6,238 | 11 | 7 | 1763.4 |
| 2004 Q1 | 6,115 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 7,471 | 5 | 3 | 669.3 |
| 2003 Q3 | 7,952 | 8 | 4 | 1006.0 |
| 2003 Q2 | 7,069 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 7,602 | 2 | 2 | 263.1 |
| 2002 Q4 | 7,756 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 7,727 | 14 | 5 | 1811.8 |
| 2002 Q2 | 6,527 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 6,401 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 8,181 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 6,024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
13 on file2019 · 2 incidents
Employee had just turned off oxygen and acetylene in the back of the work truck. Employee stepped back to get down out of the bed of the truck and their left foot slipped off bumper. They tumbled out of back of truck and fell awkwardly on their left leg injuring the left knee. Knee swollen and unable to walk at this time.
2018 · 3 incidents
Employee was using a small sledge hammer to knock a roller loose so the conveyor belt at crusher could be lowered to remove excess material. Employee missed roller and struck conveyor frame with right hand cutting and fracturing right ring finger.
Employee was using a a cheater pipe ratchet to adjust the belt on the tail pulley at the hopper. Employee was pushing away from EE's body on ratchet when it sprang back and struck EE on the right lower part of EE's face and jaw. EE had a split lip with contusion and some tooth damage. EE received stitches in the lip and went to a dentist.
Empl was helping other empls get an ATV unstuck from mire. Trackhoe was called in. Trackhoe got stuck. Operator stood up to dismount from trackhoe when leg hit lever causing boom to swing to the right striking empl in the lower back area. Empl received bruises from being hit. Has gone to doctor and received pain medication
2017 · 1 incident
An inattentive loader operator allowed their 980H Cat end loader to back into an employee's parked vehicle. The operator had been loading the hopper for over an hour without incident when the accident occurred. There were no problems with the brakes on the loader. There was no damage to the loader, however, the 2000 Tacoma pickup suffered extensive damage.
2015 · 1 incident
Employee was changing teeth on backhoe bucket. He struck a tooth with a hammer to loosen it and a piece of steel broke off striking him in the forehead above his safety glasses. Small piece of steel lodged under skin. Went to ER where steel was removed and the wound glued shut. No lost time happened on Saturday just before plant shut down.
2014 · 1 incident
Employee was dismounting from D6R Caterpillar dozer when his left foot slipped between the track and the blade arm. He tumbled forward injuring his left knee and left wrist. Injuries were diagnosed as a sprained left knee and left wrist. The fall was caused by buildup of material on the dozer blade arm.
2013 · 1 incident
Employee was shoveling under feeder hopper. He felt something in his back. He continued working. His back got progressively worse over the next two days until he couldn't come into work. Doctor gave him a shot and a prescription. Employee did not know what doctor's diagnosis was. Presently, (05/24/13) he is back at work & says his back is not completely well but he is working.
2009 · 1 incident
EE was lifting crusher shoes out of shipping container. Shoes weigh approx 80 pounds each. He felt a pulling sensation in abdomen. He had a pulled or strained muscle.
2007 · 1 incident
Employee was assisting with welding of lagging onto head pulley for a conveyor belt. He was attempting to hold lagging when the welding rod contacted the head pully causing an arc. He was not wearing eye protection at that time because he was not expecting an arc. Employee felt the effects of flash burn to his eyes after he got home from work later that day.
2004 · 2 incidents
Employee was inspecting the trough ont he stockpile belt. as he was climbing down his right leg swung but striking a wire cable support causing a puncture would. employee received same stitches to close the wound. he would have returned to work the next day but the dr said bp was too high.
EMPLOYEE WAS REPORTING TO WORK AT SCALE HOUSE. EMPLOYEE LOST FOOTING ON BANK BEHIND THE SCALE HOUSE CAUSING HER TO FALL AWKWARDLY ON LEFT ANKLE. LIGAMENTS WERE TORN IN THE LEFT ANKLE WITH SCRAPES AND ABRASIONS ON THE LEFT LEG. EMPLOYEE TRIED TO WORK UNTIL 5/4/04. WILL HAVE DAYS AWAY FROM WORK.