Day of incident and on, the injury was treated as a first Aid. EE's injury became a modified work duty on 10-29-2025. Equipment Operator was descending the ladder and missed the last step causing EE to fall and injury EE's right shoulder.
Amrize Rosser Sand Plant: 115 MSHA citations Metal/Non-Metal
Amrize Rosser Sand Plant has $41K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 2 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Watch this mine
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at Amrize Rosser Sand Plant.
- Fatalities
- 0
- Total incidents
- 16
- Years on record
- 2004–2025
- Latest incident
- Oct 2025
ⓘ
This rate is recorded citations divided by MSHA inspection hours, per 100 hours. It reflects inspection effort, not mine size or production.ⓘ
A Section 107(a) order removes miners from an area when an inspector finds an imminent danger. Each order is lifted once the condition is corrected, so this counts orders issued, not orders now in effect.Amrize Rosser Sand Plant has $41K in proposed MSHA penalties and $0 outstanding across 2 contested dockets.
ⓘ
Differences between proposed and paid penalties reflect both settlements and conference reductions and amounts still owed. Outstanding is the balance currently owed.ⓘ
Shares are computed over citations that carry the MSHA gravity and negligence coding; a small share of records are uncoded.ⓘ
Contesting a citation before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a lawful right. These figures state the public outcomes of that process, from MSHA's Contested Violations file.- Settled 1 · 33%
- Vacated or withdrawn 2 · 67%
ⓘ
Counts a Significant & Substantial citation as surviving when a settlement or judge's decision kept the designation, or the contest was dismissed or defaulted so the citation stands as issued. Vacated and withdrawn citations, and settlements that removed the designation, count against.ⓘ
A reduction or dismissal at the Commission is a lawful outcome of contesting a proposed penalty. Figures are the proposed amount and the amount upheld in the docket's decision.| Docket | Decision | Judge | Year | Proposed / upheld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT 2011-1164M | Settlement | Lesnick | 2011 | $1K → $227 |
| CENT 2009-745M | Withdrawal | Lesnick | 2010 | $200 → $0 |
ⓘ
A sample is a point in time compliance measurement, not an individual exposure history. These figures describe MSHA sampling records and do not establish causation or personal dose.Metal and nonmetal contaminants (personal samples)
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.
Last sampled: 2025-06-02
ⓘ
Many samples are screening measurements of substances with no applicable exposure limit; they are counted as samples but excluded from every over-limit figure. Over-limit shares use only limit-tested samples.- Respirable dust, <.1mg16
- Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz2
- Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz1
- Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz1
Show the individual readings (20)
| Date | Contaminant | Concentration | Limit | Conc / limit | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2025-06-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2025-06-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2025-06-02 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2024-12-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2024-12-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2024-12-17 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2024-12-17 | Nuisance dust, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.18 | 10 | 0.02 | Rotary Bucket Ex. Operator |
| 2022-08-09 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2022-08-09 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-09-20 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.41 | 0.34 | Supervisor, Co. Official |
| 2016-09-20 | Quartz, respirable, >1% Qtz | 0.14 | 0.55 | 0.25 | Washer Operator |
| 2016-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Front-end Loader Operator | ||
| 2016-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2016-09-20 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Backhoe Operator | ||
| 2009-10-28 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Laborer, Bullgang | ||
| 2009-10-28 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Truck Driver | ||
| 2009-03-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Bulldozer Operator | ||
| 2009-03-18 | Respirable dust, <.1mg | 0 | Dragline Operator | ||
| 2009-03-18 | Unlisted Particulate, respirable, <1% Qtz | 0.12 | Front-end Loader Operator |
Amrize Rosser Sand Plant recorded 2.83 reportable injury cases per 100 full-time workers in 2025.
ⓘ
This rate is reportable injury cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers per year, computed as 200,000 times cases divided by MSHA operator-reported employee-hours. Cases are injuries MSHA graded degree 01 through 07; accident-only events that hurt no one are excluded, and so are contractor injuries, whose hours do not attach to a single mine. Rates begin in 2000, when quarterly employment reporting starts, and are withheld below 20,000 hours in a year.| Year | total case rate | days-away | fatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 * | 2.83 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2024 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2023 * | 2.53 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2022 * | 3.36 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2021 * | 6.63 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2020 * | 5.87 | 2.94 | 0.000 |
| 2019 * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| 2018 * | 8.32 | 0.00 | 0.000 |
- Amrize South Central Inc. 2003 to present
| Year | Employees |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 30 |
| 2025 | 29 |
| 2024 | 31 |
| 2023 | 31 |
| 2022 | 23 |
| 2021 | 24 |
| 2020 | 28 |
| 2019 | 24 |
| 2018 | 20 |
| 2017 | 20 |
| 2016 | 18 |
| 2015 | 16 |
| 2014 | 15 |
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2012 | 9 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2010 | 11 |
| 2009 | 10 |
| 2008 | 10 |
| 2007 | 17 |
| 2006 | 19 |
| 2005 | 15 |
| 2004 | 13 |
| 2003 | 12 |
Amrize Rosser Sand Plant sits in Kaufman County, Texas, where the Census mining category is 0.6% of county employment.
ⓘ
County figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 5-year pooled estimates, so the 2023 vintage covers 2019 through 2023. The Census category is 'mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction', which is broader than MSHA jurisdiction and includes oil and gas workers no mine employs. These figures describe the surrounding county, not this mine, and are not a factor in any specific incident.ⓘ
Citations per million reported employee-hours. Rates begin in 2000, when MSHA's quarterly employment data starts; earlier incidents are counted but cannot be rate-adjusted. Quarters under 100,000 reported hours are greyed: too few hours for a stable rate.| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 18,981 | 3 | 0 | 158.1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 15,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 17,007 | 2 | 0 | 117.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 17,843 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 19,602 | 7 | 0 | 357.1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 16,116 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q4 | 19,862 | 4 | 1 | 201.4 |
| 2024 Q3 | 20,862 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Show 81 earlier quarters Hide earlier quarters
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | 18,452 | 2 | 0 | 108.4 |
| 2024 Q1 | 20,447 | 1 | 0 | 48.9 |
| 2023 Q4 | 18,769 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q3 | 19,974 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q2 | 20,187 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 20,256 | 1 | 1 | 49.4 |
| 2022 Q4 | 14,340 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 17,902 | 4 | 0 | 223.4 |
| 2022 Q2 | 15,360 | 1 | 1 | 65.1 |
| 2022 Q1 | 11,861 | 1 | 0 | 84.3 |
| 2021 Q4 | 12,571 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 13,971 | 4 | 3 | 286.3 |
| 2021 Q2 | 17,141 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 16,679 | 2 | 0 | 119.9 |
| 2020 Q4 | 16,557 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 14,438 | 1 | 0 | 69.3 |
| 2020 Q2 | 18,674 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q1 | 18,430 | 1 | 0 | 54.3 |
| 2019 Q4 | 15,748 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 14,394 | 3 | 0 | 208.4 |
| 2019 Q2 | 12,087 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 11,559 | 2 | 0 | 173.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 8,161 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 13,797 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q2 | 14,269 | 2 | 0 | 140.2 |
| 2018 Q1 | 11,860 | 3 | 0 | 253.0 |
| 2017 Q4 | 9,407 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 12,258 | 4 | 0 | 326.3 |
| 2017 Q2 | 13,193 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 12,024 | 2 | 0 | 166.3 |
| 2016 Q4 | 11,552 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 12,040 | 4 | 2 | 332.2 |
| 2016 Q2 | 10,235 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 8,155 | 1 | 0 | 122.6 |
| 2015 Q4 | 6,460 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q3 | 5,999 | 4 | 2 | 666.8 |
| 2015 Q2 | 6,566 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q1 | 9,037 | 2 | 0 | 221.3 |
| 2014 Q4 | 7,822 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q3 | 8,866 | 8 | 1 | 902.3 |
| 2014 Q2 | 8,117 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q1 | 8,175 | 5 | 1 | 611.6 |
| 2013 Q4 | 7,097 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q3 | 8,187 | 3 | 0 | 366.4 |
| 2013 Q2 | 7,409 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 6,861 | 2 | 0 | 291.5 |
| 2012 Q4 | 4,349 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q3 | 6,197 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 5,711 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 6,521 | 4 | 1 | 613.4 |
| 2011 Q4 | 7,613 | 1 | 0 | 131.4 |
| 2011 Q3 | 7,853 | 2 | 1 | 254.7 |
| 2011 Q2 | 7,414 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 6,455 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 5,942 | 3 | 1 | 504.9 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,993 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 6,443 | 3 | 0 | 465.6 |
| 2010 Q1 | 5,051 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 5,028 | 2 | 0 | 397.8 |
| 2009 Q3 | 4,798 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 5,153 | 7 | 3 | 1358.4 |
| 2009 Q1 | 4,976 | 2 | 0 | 401.9 |
| 2008 Q4 | 6,258 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 4,444 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q2 | 10,379 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 9,485 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 9,928 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q3 | 10,616 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 10,704 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 11,259 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q4 | 11,673 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 8,235 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 8,119 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q1 | 8,115 | 5 | 1 | 616.1 |
| 2004 Q4 | 8,153 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 7,550 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q2 | 7,317 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q1 | 8,331 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 6,964 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q3 | 7,346 | 3 | 0 | 408.4 |
| 2003 Q2 | 3,611 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Reportable incidents
16 on file2025 · 1 incident
2023 · 1 incident
Dozer operator exited the dozer cab and pinched left pinky finger in the door as EE closed the cab door.
2022 · 1 incident
Employee was bit by an insect while using a porta potty and experienced an allergic reaction from the insect bite.
2021 · 2 incidents
Haul truck driver stated: drove over a pothole in the road then began experiencing lower back pain and numbness in left leg.
Admin asst entered shop to clock in for the day. As EE entered the building EE slipped on silt and mud that was on the ground. EE injured right hip. Injury initially treated with first aid measures. Employee received medical treatment on 08/09/21.
2020 · 3 incidents
Equipment operator exited D9 dozer and fell down to the track. Operator suffered laceration to right knee.
Employee was attempting to place a shackle over the frame of a log washer and smashed right pinky finger resulting in stitches.
A plant operator was changing the bearings on a field conveyor. EE was using a wrench to loosen a bolt. The wrench slipped off the bolt and the employee hit right elbow on the feeding trough. Injury was initially first aid. Management found out on 02/17/20 that employee was prescribed pain medication by a DR from this incident. Employee never got the prescription filled.
2018 · 2 incidents
Plant manager was assisting employees with driving in a bushing on an excavator bucket. The plant manager was using a 20 lb sledge hammer to drive in the bushing. The next day the plant manager felt pain in the back and hands. Their hands also started to swell.
The plant operator went to shut off the water valve that was left open overnight due to freezing weather. As EE approached the valve EE slipped on some ice that was covering the plate and fell hitting EE's knee on the corner of the plate that was embedded into the concrete slab causing a puncture below EE's right knee cap.
2015 · 1 incident
While exiting the load the employee stepped in the mud and his foot got stuck. The employee strained his left knee trying to get his foot out of the mud.
2014 · 1 incident
While performing maintenance on the conveyor EE crawled over conveyor belt from one catwalk to another to check bearing placement while crawling back to original catwalk he placed his foot on a piece of wood on the catwalk rolled his left ankle resulting in sprain/strain/contusion to the left foot and ankle.
2009 · 2 incidents
Employee was manually rolling the conveyor due to a power outage when his finger got caught between the conveyor and the pulley resulting in a laceration to his right index finger.
Employee was using pressure washer to clean equipment when he decided to use on his boot. The wand slipped and went in his boot resulting in a burn to left foot
2007 · 1 incident
Employee was exiting cab of truck when he stepped to the ground, twisting right knee.
2004 · 1 incident
EE WAS BENT DOWN CLEANING OIL SPILL ON DRAGLINE WHEN SLIPPED AND FELL BACKWARD HIT FINGER AGAINST METAL GRATING ON FLOOR OF DRAGLINE. THEN YANKED FINGER OUT, RESULTING IN OPEN FRACTURE OF LEFT LITTLE FINGER.