CEMEX - WEST VALLEY has $22K in proposed MSHA penalties and $58 outstanding across 1 contested dockets, plus health sampling and the full incident record.
Email me when a new MSHA incident is filed at CEMEX - WEST VALLEY.
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 5,871 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8,342 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8,326 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9,831 | 1 | 0 | 101.7 |
| 2024 Q4 | 9,219 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q3 | 9,686 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q2 | 9,416 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 Q1 | 8,630 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Quarter | Hours worked | Citations | S&S | Per 1M hrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Q4 | 7,449 | 1 | 0 | 134.2 |
| 2023 Q3 | 8,317 | 1 | 0 | 120.2 |
| 2023 Q2 | 8,663 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 Q1 | 9,467 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q4 | 9,473 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q3 | 9,811 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q2 | 11,403 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2022 Q1 | 6,558 | 2 | 0 | 305.0 |
| 2021 Q4 | 11,126 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q3 | 12,070 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q2 | 11,575 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 Q1 | 9,702 | 2 | 0 | 206.1 |
| 2020 Q4 | 10,195 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q3 | 11,026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2020 Q2 | 13,126 | 1 | 1 | 76.2 |
| 2020 Q1 | 12,842 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q4 | 13,327 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q3 | 13,097 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q2 | 13,143 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2019 Q1 | 12,168 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q4 | 12,202 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q3 | 12,915 | 1 | 0 | 77.4 |
| 2018 Q2 | 12,360 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2018 Q1 | 11,562 | 1 | 0 | 86.5 |
| 2017 Q4 | 11,896 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q3 | 10,884 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q2 | 12,155 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2017 Q1 | 11,579 | 1 | 0 | 86.4 |
| 2016 Q4 | 10,684 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q3 | 11,077 | 2 | 0 | 180.6 |
| 2016 Q2 | 10,199 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2016 Q1 | 7,596 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q4 | 9,483 | 3 | 1 | 316.4 |
| 2015 Q3 | 8,312 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2015 Q2 | 8,870 | 1 | 0 | 112.7 |
| 2015 Q1 | 8,071 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q4 | 8,826 | 4 | 0 | 453.2 |
| 2014 Q3 | 9,523 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2014 Q2 | 9,684 | 1 | 0 | 103.3 |
| 2014 Q1 | 9,675 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q4 | 9,613 | 4 | 0 | 416.1 |
| 2013 Q3 | 11,132 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q2 | 11,034 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 Q1 | 11,227 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q4 | 11,256 | 2 | 0 | 177.7 |
| 2012 Q3 | 11,443 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q2 | 10,118 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 Q1 | 8,027 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q4 | 7,528 | 1 | 0 | 132.8 |
| 2011 Q3 | 10,046 | 11 | 7 | 1095.0 |
| 2011 Q2 | 8,819 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 Q1 | 7,594 | 3 | 2 | 395.0 |
| 2010 Q4 | 6,948 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q3 | 7,812 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 Q2 | 6,518 | 2 | 0 | 306.8 |
| 2010 Q1 | 5,403 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q4 | 5,396 | 5 | 2 | 926.6 |
| 2009 Q3 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 Q2 | 6,052 | 2 | 0 | 330.5 |
| 2009 Q1 | 7,901 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q4 | 9,197 | 2 | 0 | 217.5 |
| 2008 Q3 | 8,697 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q2 | 6,404 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 Q1 | 9,161 | 3 | 0 | 327.5 |
| 2007 Q4 | 11,928 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q3 | 13,673 | 1 | 0 | 73.1 |
| 2007 Q2 | 11,859 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 Q1 | 11,495 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q4 | 8,679 | 2 | 1 | 230.4 |
| 2006 Q3 | 6,236 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q2 | 16,064 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 Q1 | 17,538 | 3 | 0 | 171.1 |
| 2005 Q4 | 17,058 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q3 | 18,025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 Q2 | 17,603 | 7 | 0 | 397.7 |
| 2005 Q1 | 15,225 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q4 | 13,905 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 Q3 | 13,546 | 5 | 2 | 369.1 |
| 2004 Q2 | 13,951 | 8 | 2 | 573.4 |
| 2004 Q1 | 13,210 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q4 | 12,369 | 2 | 0 | 161.7 |
| 2003 Q3 | 12,699 | 3 | 1 | 236.2 |
| 2003 Q2 | 9,315 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 Q1 | 8,829 | 7 | 3 | 792.8 |
| 2002 Q4 | 11,856 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q3 | 12,205 | 9 | 0 | 737.4 |
| 2002 Q2 | 12,945 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 Q1 | 12,677 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q4 | 12,388 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q3 | 13,304 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 Q1 | 13,695 | 23 | 10 | 1679.4 |
| 2000 Q4 | 12,768 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q3 | 13,540 | 9 | 8 | 664.7 |
| 2000 Q2 | 12,612 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 Q1 | 11,930 | 6 | 5 | 502.9 |
Employee slipped coming down the ladder of a 980H. Employee landed on EE's rear end and EE's left elbow. Employee has been placed on light duty.
Employee was adjusting the jaw crusher when the spring retaining washer failed causing a laceration and broken right pinky finger.
Employee stated ee felt a pain in back while climbing ladder getting into haul truck
employee tried to pull himself into a grader using the grader ladder and strained his knee
EE was cleaning underneath crusher and poked his right index finger on a piece of barbwire.
EE was using a pry bar to remove ware plate from a screen, when he felt pain in his lower back.
While attempting to get into the cab of one of the trucks, he grabbed one of the handholds and stepped onto the running board and twisted his knee.
Two EEs were making a connection. One pulled the Kelly up while the other set the slip in the table. The joint was set lower than usual. The two tongs were installed. The driller engaged the break-out tong 2-3 times unsucessfully. They decided to use the make-up tong to break the joint. When he engaged the clutch the tong came around the derrick leg and broke victim's hand.
Employee slipped on unknown object near screen rack area. To brace the fall, employee reached for the top screen and lacerated his hand.
EE was bit by a spider while shoveling in the conveyor tunnel.
Employee was tigtening tooth of loader by pounding pin back into tooth when a sliver of metal came off pin and struck employee in abdomen.
A dated report covering the 26-year penalty trail, line-item violation pattern, contest and docket posture, rate-normalized peer benchmark, and full fatality history. Delivered as a PDF with the underlying data as CSV.